As lawmakers consider extending lawsuit protections for Florida's nursing home industry in the upcoming Legislative Session, one House Republican will push to scrap a current law requiring a portion of punitive damages awarded in lawsuits be placed in a state trust fund.

Rep. Amber Mariano's HB 6035 would eliminate a mandate that half of any punitive damages awarded in lawsuits against nursing homes or assisted living facilities be directed to a fund dedicated to quality improvement efforts.

The punitive damage provision was included in a 2001 omnibus measure meant to improve quality of care at Florida's longterm care facilities as well as protect nursing homes from litigation.

That same trust fund also receives a portion of the assessments the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services levies against facilities for failing to comply with federal requirements.

Budget documents submitted to lawmakers earlier this month show the fund has an available balance of about $32 million for the state fiscal year beginning next July. In the fiscal year that ended this past summer, $200,350 in punitive damages were deposited in the trust fund.

That was below $473,475 in punitive damages deposited into the trust fund during the 2019-20 fiscal year.

Florida Health Care Association spokesperson Kristen Knapp said the proposed change sought by Mariano would not improve resident care.

"These funds would better serve our nursing home residents if they were directed toward quality care improvements, including programs that support our workforce challenges, enhance technologies and other activities that directly benefit those entrusted to our care," Knapp said in a statement to Florida Politics.

For instance, Knapp said funds from the trust currently are being used to help foot the costs for a two year project dubbed the CaregiversFL Career Program. Knapp said the program is designed to promote longterm care job opportunities as well as enhance recruitment and retention efforts and build partnerships with statewide educational, workforce and veteran organizations.

But the Florida Justice Association, the group representing the state's trial attorneys, has a much different viewpoint.

"The current law serves no purpose other than to deter plaintiffs from pursuing legitimate claims for punitive damages," FJA Deputy Director & Director of Legislative Affairs Jeff Porter said. "It then gives this money to undeserving nursing homes for expenses they should pay for themselves like any other legitimate business. It comes down to a fundamental issue of fairness."

Porter said Mariano's proposal is a "step in the right direction of ensuring the state is not allowing corporations to profit from mistreating the generations that built our great state."

A nursing home or assisted living facility in Florida may be liable for punitive damages only if a judge or jury finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the facility actively and knowingly engaged in intentional misconduct or in conduct that constitutes gross negligence and contributed to the claimant's loss, damages, or injury.

Punitive damages generally are limited to three times the amount of compensatory damages, or $1 million, whichever is greater. A jury can, though, award four times the amount of compensatory damages, or $4 million, whichever is greater, if it finds that the conduct was motivated primarily by unreasonable financial gain and the dangerous nature of the conduct was known by the managing agent, director, officer, or other person responsible for making policy decisions on behalf of the defendant.

Mariano did not immediately respond to a request for comment on her bill.

She filed a similar bill during the 2021 Session that cleared one House panel, but it ultimately died after the Senate refused to consider an identical bill. Mariano refiled the bill for the 2022 Legislative Session, though, as lawmakers are likely to consider legislation to extend COVID-19 protections initially granted to nursing homes and physicians. Those protections expire in March 2022 and the nursing home industry already has signaled it intends to ask the Legislature to extend the protections beyond that expiration date.