#MeToo (when it should be #Me∞), still trending, all across, the global, planet currently, and this, is really, BAD (for a lack of a, "stronger" adjective…), but it'd gained him, an alternative, sort of, fame, off of the Front Page Sections, t… Read on blog or Reader Mirroring the World Read on blog or Reader Mike Ho: I Didn't Do Anything Improper to Her, after Being Accused of Forcibly Kissing a Woman, as His Home was, Raided taurusingemini May 25 #MeToo (when it should be #Me∞), still trending, all across, the global, planet currently, and this, is really, BAD (for a lack of a, "stronger" adjective…), but it'd gained him, an alternative, sort of, fame, off of the Front Page Sections, translated… The Police Confiscated His Cell Phone, He Was Logged in as a Top Search Name A woman pressed charges on Mike Ho, accusing him of forcibly sexually molesting her, the Songshan Substation of the Taipei Police Department went to search his home yesterday, confiscated his cell phone, but didn't call Ho in for questioning, or have him in custody, but the Taipei D.A.'s Office called on two witnesses to testify in court to understand what had happened, and after interviewing, Ho was sent home, Ho issued a statement, that he didn't, cross the boundaries, that he will, comply with the requests made of him in the investigations. Based off of understanding, at the start of the year, the Songshan Police Substation had received a report, a woman accused Ho for improper bodily contact and forcibly kissing her, that he was suspected of obstruction of sexual freedom, the police took the case and began investigating, awhile ago, Ho and other related individuals had been, interviewed, and the case is sent to Taipei District Attorney's Office. the actor who'd been, accused...photo from online The district attorney's office directed the Songshan Substation to search Ho's residence, the point in confiscating his cell phone, and not ruled out calling Ho to testify to explain later. Ho had his attorney spoke on his behalf, stressed that he'd never been, improper, but because the investigators had made a request of him, he'd simply, complied. The rumor was, that Ho was at a private location, attending a gathering with his friends, and was introduced to a female acquaintance, as they both became intoxicated, they'd had, more intimate physical contact with one another, including kissing, to French kissing, the woman felt that Ho was "improper" toward her, pressed charges. On this, the investigators didn't deny, nor confirmed the accusations of the woman, stated that due to privacy issues and the case being investigated, they're not at liberty to tell anything to the press yet.  Ho's performance in "Imperfect Us" had been outstanding, his acting career is on the rise, and had been, caught in the scandal, and the incident had gotten on the trending topic. So, because someone made an accusation, the police must investigate, and, the result of the investigation is still pending, so nobody can say who's right or wrong, but, if this case had been proven valid, then it just, added to how the famous think that they could, get away with, any and everything, and that's not a good thing for the society, as #MeToo trends still… Comment Like You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Mirroring the World © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe. Get the Jetpack app Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app! Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110

Not of moral responsibilities, but more of "territorial rights"…from The New York Times that came with today's papers… Foreign policies can make a mockery of moral certitude.  You're trying to master a landscape of anarchy policed by… Read on blog or Reader Mirroring the World Read on blog or Reader Moralism in the Middle East, by: Ross Douthat taurusingemini May 25 Not of moral responsibilities, but more of "territorial rights"…from The New York Times that came with today's papers… Foreign policies can make a mockery of moral certitude.  You're trying to master a landscape of anarchy policed by violence, where ideological differences make American polarization look like general neighborliness, where even a superpower's ability to impose its will dissolves with distance, where any grand project requires alliances with tyranny and worse. This seems clear when you consider the dilemmas of the past.  It's why the "good war" of World War II involved a partnership with a monster in Moscow and the subjection of half of Europe to totalitarian oppression.  It's why the "bad war" of Vietnam was only escaped at the cost of betraying the South Vietnamese and making a deal with yet another monster in Beijing. But in active controversies the tragic vision can seem like a cold way of looking at the world.  Lean into it too hard, and you get accused of ignoring injustice or recapitulating the indifference that gave cover to past atrocities. Sometimes those accusations have some bite.  A "realist" foreign policy can slide from describing power to excusing depredations.  It can underestimate the power of a righteous cause—as I underestimated, for instance, Ukraine's capacity to defend itself in 2022. But seeing statecraft as a tragic balancing of evils is still essential, especially amid the kind of moral fervor that attends a conflict like Israel-s war in the Gaza Strip.  The alternative is a form of argument in which essential aspects of the world, being inconvenient to moral absolutism, simply, disappear. Then a similar point applies to supporters of the Israeli war for whom moral considerations—the evil of Hamas, the historical suffering of the Jewish people, the special American relationship with Israel—are invoked as argument-ender in an inflexible way. Biden's specific attempts to micromanage the conflict may be misguided or ham-fisted.  But it's not misguided for America, an  imperium dealing with multiplying threats, to decline to write a blank check for a war being waged without a clear plan for victory or for peace. Being cold-eyed and tragic-minded does not mean abandoning morality.  But it means recognizing that often nobody is simply right, no single approach is morally obvious, and no strategy is clean. And so, the Israeli-Hama war has nothing do to with what's morally responsible, how the Palestinians are trying to establish their own independently ruled territory, because they don't want to be ruled under the Israelis anymore.  This is how the western civilizations see it: someone else's war, so long as it doesn't get into my backyard, then, I couldn't give a, @#$%.  And it's still all about money, not about the moral responsibilities these wars that are going on right now, same for the Ukrainian-Russo "conflict", because Russia perceives Ukraine's possibly being "admitted" into N.A.T.O. as N.A.T.O., expanding east, and, naturally, when someone threatens to take OVER your backyard, you would, DEFEND it, wouldn't you?  Exactly.  While the Israeli is preventing Palestine from setting up its own country, because of the fight over the holy land of Jerusalem. Comment Like You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Mirroring the World © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe. Get the Jetpack app Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app! Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110