Got away on a "technicality", because this woman's BAD behavior, of SHAKING this infant boy too hard, causing him to become, brain damaged, did NOT have the "intent" of abuse in her behavior, and this is still SHIT, how this justice system, worked, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
A nanny, Chen, because of the eight-months-old infant boy she was taking care of won't stop crying, she got upset, and started shaking the infant really hard, to the point that the infant started vomiting, his eyes started rolling to behind the lids, to the point of becoming, brain damaged, the first trial found valid evidence for Chen's abuse of the young infant boy, sentenced her to five years six months on adult intentionally harming young children on purpose; but the second trial found, that Chen's shaking the infant boy was different from burning a child's body with a cigarette, which constitutes as "torture", that what she did was only, an ordinary physical assault of the infant boy, toss back the original sentence, and gave her a light sentence of four years six months.
The indictment pointed out, Chen (age 49), was hired to look after the infant boy in December of 2020, but because the infant started crying hard, she'd picked him up, and shaken him really hard, causing the infant to suffer brain damage, and became developmentally delayed, the maternal grandmother of the infant boy found the grandson vomiting and gagging, took him to the hospital to get checked, and that was when the families were told, that he had been, abused.
During the trial of the Taichung District Court, Chen denied the allegations of abuse, claimed that she'd not abused him, the courts compared the medical records of the victim, found that although he was premature born, but there were no records of epilepsy or brain damage, that it was during the time when he was placed under Chen's care he'd started showing the signs of vomiting, convulsing, and other abnormal signs, and Chen's polygraph showed that she was, hiding something too.
The first trial pointed out, during the time the infant was left in Chen's care, the boy had suffered from the repeated severe shakes, which was the sole cause of his brain injuries, Chen's intentionally shaking the infant, based off of societal interpretation, it's "torture", sentenced Chen to five years six months.
The second trial's investigation confirmed, that Chen, in order to discipline the young infant, shook him really hard, but was still different from physically beating him, whipping him, and burning him with a cigarette to cause the physical harms, that it'd not constitute as having damaged the growth of children, the severe physical assault, that her actions only classified as the ordinary kind of assault.
And so, because there is NO "intent" proven in this case, this unfitting nanny only got a slap on the wrist, and, what of this brain damaged young infant boy, he's going to need long-term care, maybe, placed in an institution, because he won't likely be able to, care for himself, due to this BAD nanny's behaviors toward him, who's going to pay for that, huh??? The law still isn't in favor of the victims of these crimes, the law does NOT protect the victims, there's NO justice in this!
No comments:
Post a Comment