As this is my first blogged comment on the Carlson/Putin somewhat tedious 2-hour slugging bout, we might as well get it out of the way, and then try to examine - in a less propagandised space far away from the putrid US MSM savaging of Carlson before and after the event – what it really told us about the way the world works today. Some of you may find the judgement harsh.
Thanks to years of informative help from colleague Amy Boone [a rare US former diplomat expert in Russo-Ukranian history] I was well aware in advance of the fractured nature of the relationship between the two. I was, in turn, well-informed [thanks to US sources well versed in CIA-Pentagon secret bioweapon production at five main centres in Ukraine] being a further motive for Vladimir Putin to invade and knock-out such centres....which he has indeed done, with ruthless efficiency.
Overall, my bottom line here is that Tucker Carlson made a mess of attempting to get the Russian leader to be generally frank about this, merely the latest episode in a long series of devious attempts by the US unelected elite to threaten his West-facing flank by bribing the unutterably corrupt soap actor Zelenskyy.
He allowed Putin to demonstrate his command of almost a millenium of history in the region – a subject of little or no interest to the vast majority ofAmericans.Worse still, he allowed Vlad the Lad to talk about ''deNazification'' as a swirly-whirly 1940s ideological concept that might somehow be of interest to anyone born after 1970.
Carlson's interruption – ''Why is this relevant?'' - merely gave the upper hand to Putin to splurge out yet more stuff from Ivan the Terrible onwards.
A far more telling question from Carlson would have been, ''When did you know about Pentagon bioweapon development in Ukraine, and how did that make you feel?''
I waited in vain for that $64million question....but it wasn't asked.
All in all, the entire exchange left me with the feeling that I'd been watching something staged.
What the last few days since the broadcast have demonstrated, however, is a general attempt by trolls online to depict the EUNATO/Climate/Neocon/Davos NWO ranks as ''on the defensive and regrouping'', such that ''nothing further is likely to happen this year''; and specifically – as The Slog predicted fourteen months ago – Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter to create 'X' was a direct order from the secret State...the purpose of which was to replace genuine Resistance accounts with nominated trolls:
'...the less than fragrant Musk all-over deodorant has set out to show how the forgiveness of reinstated accounts vastly exceeds Twitter 'nuisance spam' he's vapourised (of course) in the name of unfettered freedom to say what you think....In order back up his case, the less than fragrant Musk all-over deodorant has done is to continue zapping the likes of genuine open-mind -lovers like Ana Viosi and Citizen Smith'.
He's replaced them with his tame trolls. Last Saturday evening after GMT 9 pm there was an infestation of spookily consistent tweets about the bad guys being all over the place and having to think again as to their next move. This morning it had turned into a non-stop crowd of faux optimism unprecedented in my experience.
More broadly right across both social media and the MSM, the same old same old 'multiple D' strategy was being applied in the order we have come to recognise – as summarised below:
DEMONISE
the main ''enemy'' players
-
DERIDE & DISMISS
any and all peacemakers
-
DISTORT WHAT HAPPENED
by false flags & selective reportage
-
DISTRACT & DIVERT ATTENTION
when distortion is revealed
-
DECEIVE & DIVIDE
using controlled opposition
-Although many will choose to see that 8D 'system' as an extract from a paranoiac's diary, let's just remind ourselves of what objective was set for the CIA by its then director William J. Casey in 1981:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Psycho or sociopath, that's one helluva confident and quintessentially anti-Bill of Rights defined objective for a man charged with devoting his organisation to the protection of the US Electorate's civil rights. Indeed, in stating his goal, he was demonstrating a total disrespect for the People's democratic discernment. Compare and contrast his dismissive remarks with those of President Lincoln on September 2, 1858, speaking in Clinton, Illinois:
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."
Abe was a man of many catchy soundbites – up there and competing with Mark Twain – but neither man had any way of knowing how digital hitech could make it entirely possible to fool almost all of the People all the time, and then engage in the Multiple D strategy to drive a fear-and-hate bonanza against the discerning 1 in 8 still schooled in the lessons of historical civics.
There will always be cause and blame. The cause of our muzzled Western MSM is the obscene power of shareholder clout [via bourse-money investment in the hands of just three Goliaths]. The blame lies with those who terrify the bourgeoisie with false threats and dangers – ranging from the Russian Federation to the zero problem of C02 via a Sino-American pandemic created in a lab somewhere and then ''treated'' with mRNA bioweapons – such that they fail to take cognition of damning unexplained death numbers that make criminals of Pfizer, Moderna - and at least eleven members of the current near-paraplegic UK Conservative and US Democrat administrations.
You doubt the joined-at-the-hip common aims of the EU and NATO? Fine: so how do you explain Washington's annihilation of Greek independence and newly expressed determination to mete out the same fate to Hungary? Is this what the profoundly unpleasant Guy Verhofstadt means by ''our shared democratic values''? Liberal democracy is on the run, and EUNATO is providing the fuel for a Silver Streak non-stop runaway train to arrive at Dystopia Central before you can say Ursula Van der Leyen.
Rishi Sunak and The Chosen One Jeremy Hunt are engaged in a carefully planned and consistent campaign to deliver Great Britain into the cold and slimey grip of a New World Order desired by less than 0.03 per cent of the global human population. Their secret weapon is the sheer unbelievability of the end game. A gutless MSM throughout the West flatly refuses to analyse Sunak's politically suicidal policies in that context.
Will we, I wonder, ever find a way to forgive this dereliction of duty by the Fourth Estate?
Either way, the bottom lines for this observer are:
- I'm no longer sure which side (if any) Tucker Carlson is on.
- I'm reasonably sure that dozens of paid bots going ''hahahaha - look, we're winning...they're on the run!'' suggests to me that we're being lulled into a false sense of security.
- Neither of the aggressive neocon foreign policy adventures in Ukraine and Palestine have been solved.
- What is abundantly clear now is that the finally centralised EUNATO bloc is going to crush every form of member State resistance to Brussels with precisely the same venom as the USSR in the 1950s. In 1956, Hungary was crushed. At some point, the same long-suffering nation is going to get the baseball bat treatment for being ''off message''. More details about that anon.
What's more, it seems almost impossible in 2024 to get people to care about their rights and liberties. It sounds, I know, slightly comic when put like that - pace Rab C Nesbitt remarking, ''Iss gettan' harrd to be a bloody layaboot in Glasga these days, Pal'' - but this couple of paras from Meryl Nass about the ridiculous plans of the WHO nails it rather well here:
'If this was only about a trade agreement, why is everyone talking about the loss of sovereignty, the imposition of global censorship, and global governance being brought in under the guise of "pandemic preparedness"? Because those are the real issues. Don't let yourself be fooled that this is merely a trade disagreement.
The WHO has been co-opted in an attempt at a global "soft coup" in which most western governments are sadly complicit, and there really cannot be any argument about what the issues are, since it is all right there in the documents themselves. A trade disagreement is only a minuscule piece of what these documents are really about'.
Why is no MSM voice known to me raging about the WHO chief's appalling record of weaponising drugs to get rid of opposition tribe members elsewhere in Africa? He is a rabid hardline Stalinist who wants to blithely walk into any sovereign that takes his fancy and mandate the use of bioweapons risibly referred to as vaccines. For heaven's sake - we just went through three years of this mass cull and - as ever - nobody went to jail.
Does anyone still think that the US surveillance State hasn't got it in for POTUS candidate Donald Trump? Astonishingly, the answer is ''Yes, and there are millions of them''. Go figure.
Does any UK national press reader really think Rishi Sunak is saying, ''Vaccines are safe and England is ready to go to war with Russia'' because he's had a secret brainoctomy? Sadly yes - same answer - because the legacy MSM flatly refuses to go beyond childish insults: they will write that migrants and talk of war will doom the Tories....but nobody is prepared to type onto a laptop for submission to the editor asking, ''WHY is he doing this?'' and then, you know, coming up with a few ideas that fit the facts....the way journalists used to?
The bourse Big 3 own the media, the UK security forces want us back in the EU, the police have been politicised, MPs have been muzzled, education has taken a dive and wants our kids to believe all science is settled and LGBTQ is an exemplary addition to diversity....and now the UK Army top brass want to ''retrain'' hundreds of thousands among our not terribly diverse new migrant Islamist thugs in the business of wearing a uniform and killing all these 'threats and enemies' foisted upon us by the ''special relationship'' with Washington.
And please, before anyone brings the subject up, enough ''Nigel will sort it all out'' already: Nigel Farage deserves everyone's respect for his unstinting courage in both putting up with having ''racist!'' yelled at him by pond life for much of the last twenty-five years, and being way ahead of the game on the illiberal bullies of Brussels. But as he would himself accept, he is a born and bred boursophile who, broadly speaking, supports the principle of bourse banking firms providing liquidity. We are now way past the stage when any genuinely democratic radical would deny the obvious fact that obese wealth management has perverted the system to the point where it has been weaponised to deny free speech purely through the power the Big Three wield right across every investment sector....covering super-sensitive issues in arms manufacturing, media control, political lobbying, pharmaceuticals and a host of similarly tricky ethical areas. Farage represents a Front of ''New Opposition'' in the UK that is at best amateurish and in which few in the electorate have much faith. [As I have stressed many times before, in fact, The UK's constitutional problem is that it doesn't have a truly effective Opposition].
If you frighten the People during five or six years, paradoxically they become far more receptive to the idea that world takeover is not that well advanced - so the X trolls will have been pushing at an open door over the weekend. After the 1938 Munich Agreement between the UK and Hitler's Germany, the relief of not going to war was palpable - again, self-delusion kicked in and British citizens so desperately wanted not to have another inhuman trench and tank war with the appalling gas attacks, they quickly convinced themselves that Hitler could be trusted.
Fast forward to now, and once again misplaced optimism is being encouraged by [for example] the US magazine Politico, that has been running stories saying Europeans will not fight Putin, that Ukraine will be left to its fate and Trump will carry the can for being defeatist - Nikki Hayley is already taking that line - and undermining the ''cause of democracy''. It's mainly BS: and fits with the secret Sunak plan for a surprise attack using local anti-Russian satellites as allies if and when the Germans get cold feet.
Meanwhile, out of the other side of its editorial mouth, Politico is running posts saying the diametric opposite. Result: utter confusion....especially as the site in the EU is a joint venture with by Axel Springer, an avowedly anti-Sovyet corporation, pro blocist EU come what may and, overall, pro-US, pro-NATO, pro-Israel, pro-austerity, pro-capital, anti-Russia, anti-China organisation. It's founder Herr Springer was described to me by a German social democrat acquaintance some forty years ago as ''the love-child of Genghis Khan and Rupert Murdoch''.
More recently, in an interview with The Nation, two former CIA officers alleged that Axel Springer received $7 million from the CIA to support American geopolitical interests with his publishing house. Springer reportedly agreed and began guiding the editorial bias towards supporting US foreign policy. From its own corporate blurb, The Nation is ''the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, and the most widely read weekly journal of progressive political and cultural news, opinion and analysis''.
There's that Progressive word again. The bedfellows get more unlikely with every week.
No comments:
Post a Comment