Since recorded history began more than four thousand years ago, almost no known human culture (significant or otherwise) has stuck with sobriety throughout life. Be the mind alteration wet bark, whisky, naturally occurring psychoactive plants, tobacco, mushrooms or refined heroin's distant relatives, everyone needs to get high and leave the daily shit-bucket of drudgery behind.
The reason is staggeringly easy to propose: life was, until around a hundred years ago, brutish and short. The natural order of things was that the Alpha males provided for the pack, but most of their charges died before the age of 24. This meant that not only was statutory rape a lifestyle choice, as the pack was forever dying more quickly than replacing it was an absolute essential for Group survival. But the stark terror of a brief existence without merriness meant that escape to the Land of Ganja etcetera was, for most, a Civil Right they wouldn't let go of without a fight. And the habituation just went on and on [See 18th century London gin riots).
Today in the First World, one could argue that more people are well-fed, content and have a roof over their heads than at any point in history: in 2023, obesity killed more people globally than starvation did.
But the inability to face reality is almost universal – and drug use among all age groups higher than ever. Nowhere is this more true than in show business generally and Hollywood in particular...both of these solid BLM Democrat. As for the rest of us, it is an uphill climb most of the time to feel content and, at times, happy.
This isn't because we are intrinsically depressive: our Secret States and education systems have taken deliberately scared and confused kids, rewarding only certainty of belief that, in and of itself, breeds intolerance of others and ignores all profound scientific change. Everything must be settled. Settled is a comfort blanket: the World is flat, now shut up. But speech and language and broadcasting and freedom to speak one's mind are endemic to our species. Being poked in the eye every time you want to exercise those rights is bound to lower mood.
For exxample, Global pharmacy (represented especially by the WHO) has whipped up a mood of right-brain fear and hypochondria, building on its success - via Covid19 – in showing how any old advice drivel can be made to sound like solid practice, and used to control citizen movement across the world. A long-standing neighbour of mine in Aquitaine during 2020 saw me coming and walked on the other side of the road, knowing me to be unjabbed.
"I'll faut etre prudent," he smiled, as if that made everything cool. I got the same brush-off from Parisian friends later that year on returning from Crete.
So small wonder that Homo "sapiens" is what it is today: an unhealthy melange of easily panicked, reticent, self-obsessed infants screaming against rational analysis - forever on a witch-hunt to cancel anyone whose refusal to comply with clap-trap might bring the Bogey Man to their door, while screening out the voluminous evidence of State cover-up and malfeasance.
You see, most people don't doubt, investigate and complain: they comply.
The Human Race – hypochondriacal, in awe of Big Brother, devoid of solidarity, lacking in any voyager gene, terrified by every shadow….and welcoming an army of governmental swindlers as if they might be philanthropy incarnate: Biden, Fauci, Schapps, Hunt, Johnson, Harris, Macron: not so much any port - more any pervert - in a storm.
Inevitably, exposure to a money-controlled media mob brings forward that focus of personal hate and demonisation rally so exquisitely predicted by Orwell.
We hate Trump. We hate him because he is gauche and brash, and of course in the pay of Putin, a baby-eating butcher-beast with unspeakable intentions. We hate Trump because he would be happy to let the Ukrainian hero 'Sniffy' Zelenskyy live under house arrest to spend more time with his power powders. We hate Trump because he tried to engineer an insurrection after 2020 and because he still insists that Biden's election was unsound, and the US judiciary bottled the investigation into it.
But now we lerrrv Kamila Harris because she sees Trump just like we do, has all the same views as we do, and – uncannily like us too – can't tell a washed up soap-actor cypher for the US from the most brilliant player of global diplomatic chess on the planet….this latter performing that role as a patriot out to defend his country which – let's face it – is a target the failing US hegemenists seem unable to resist.
I don't want anyone trying to force my rounded view into a square dovecot hole here. Of course Trump is a boor who plays to the yobbo gallery. Of course stuff like "I took a bullet for democracy" makes me want to puke. But do I think the FBI tried to get him shot earlier this month? Yes, I do. Do I think the pathetic Stalinist non-stop demonisation of Trump by press, TV and online media is a stain on American history? Yes I do. Do I think that New York Times devotees are a bigger threat to our freedoms than Putin could ever be? Yes I do.
As with Putin too, he loves to give a sort of pansy pin-up* aura of shirtless man riding bareback on wild horse into the great Russian dacha Beyond. Is the RF democratic: no of course not, it's a constitutional stitch-up with Medvedev. What did Putin inherit? A dangerous mess. What is it now? A country which, if left alone from the attentions of EUNATO megalomaniacs, could make a far greater input to a better world than it does. Is Vlad's rapprochement with Beijing a smart move? No, I don't think it is.
My point is: given a top ten choice of figures to have lunch with, I wouldn't include Trump or Putin. But I might expect the dumb-assed waitress to be Kamala Harris getting every order wrong. Such is Earth's awful tragedy.
*After several movies in which Chuck Heston always had to remove his shirt for purely plot-related artistic reasons, Heston finally threw a wobbly towards the end of filming Ben Hur about the bare torso thing. One of the film's producers took him to one side and explained what a Gay Icon is. A one-woman family guy from start to finish, Chuck was shaken by the news. Along with James Garner, he was one of the most likeable and genuine Hollywood people you could wish to meet. But I digress.
When I watched soon-not-to-be-but-I-will-be-so-there POTUS Candidate Wandering Joe Biden commenting on the assassination attempt against Donald Trump – and took on board his sleazeball appeal for such actions to become a thing of the past because "this is not the American way" - I think I finally realised for good and all that (come flaws and faults in the Donald) he really does have the pulse of the People this time….that is, the common people who are now the only ones who might save us.
After Biden's working arm was twisted up his backside to drop out and support Kamalabama, I spoke with a US pollster – the first one, in fact, I ever collaborated with on a hair-drier attitude survey in 1976 – to try and get their take on the Kamala bid. The reply was as follows:
"Donald Trump is heading for the greatest POTUS landslide in US history by far".
So this time the challenge the US Secret State >> WHO Jab mandate >> Depraved media complex has been briefed to accept (it has no choice) is to turn Harris from the POC-playing no-hoper into a beacon against the eternal darkness of a man who has the nerve to suggest that she is anything less than the Virgin Mary with additood.
And throughout the week ending yesterday, Saturday 17th August 2024, this baseless wind has been blowing a gale. So dear readers, at long last the segue into today's main event: putting the new DNC fix into operation.
Although this really isn't any kind of insight, the Democratic Party Cheating Machine is rapidly running out of election fiddles in order to save Amerika from Dolfi Trumpensteiger and his Fourth Reich...in truth, the one method left to them is to create an opinion-poll based bandwagon claiming that Harris can indeed win, such findings designed also to act as "proof" and "justification" that this really was a fight won fair and square by the Underdog.
The Six Stations of the Double Cross might thus develop like this, heading towards November:
Mad Trump losing ground to visionary Harris
Closing polls show Kamala will shade it
Last-minute Kamala voters leave Trump floundering
Kamala wins as Trump sour grapes dismissed by Courts
Judiciary deplores GOP "sore losers"
New President passes law making "doubters" open to five
years of imprisonment and reeducation at the Killary Hinton
Arkansas Brain Unfuck Institute for the delusional
-----------------------
How easy or difficult is it to falsify Voting Intention opinion poll results? All depends on the budget of the corruptor and the vulnerability of the recorder.
Going forward, it's beginning to look like this time [November 2024] The Democrat Damned are looking to focus on producing regular bulletins showing Harris catching up on the basis of her, shall we say, somewhat less than digestible – oh alright then, Unamerican – ideas because they are progressive, right? - compared to the fascistnazirapistracistbigot approach her opponent would like to see. Allegedly.
So how do they hope not to get caught in the act of this illegal attempt at electorate conditioning?
Well, I'm not 100% on this one as yet. But asking a question of one EU-based journalist last Thursday morning, I was genuinely shaken to hear accusations that Team Kamala has acquired the services of at least one European research conglomerate with a view to designing questionnaires in order to get the response they want…. be that intention to vote per se, or preferences between candidates where the "weighting" of importance is judged on a five-point scale of likelihood to go for Trump or Harris.
I have no wish to blind with science here: practitioners in the field, however, will know immediately what I'm on about. That is, a subtle use of directional questioning in a survey whose intrinsic bias goes unnoticed towards being 'A vote for the Candidate', when it should be recorded as 'Pro Candidate but vote not guaranteed'.
This could be seen as analyst error, or reflecting the philosophy of the pollster organisation, or even something accurate in relation to what the original respondent went on to do after the survey. The point is, constitutional illegality would be impossible to prove. The survey was "merely" using decades of experience to judge the future actions of American voters.
But whichever way you cut it, the word I'm getting is that the post-Cretin USSS White House is trying to offshore the operation.
The intention (I have to assume) is to see if sloppily coded questionnaire design can trigger answers suggesting that "Smiley" Kamala is gaining ground on "Mad" Trump….and thus create the right conditioning for a doubting electorate along the lines of, "Well to be fair, she'd been creeping up the ratings for weeks, and Trump was behaving like a prat".
In short, to ensure that the electorate is pre-conditioned towards a new Democrat White House...and complaints of rigging will be (as usual) ignored as just 'more Donald lies'.
I will be honest and admit that I do not have anything like the body of sources I built and enjoyed between 2005-2016. Most of them now are quietly retired, dead, gaga or too scared to engage. So I unashamadly ask everyone who has anything to add on this phenomenon to write to me at the usual address, jawslog@gmail.com
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday.
No comments:
Post a Comment