parttimemomdigest: [New post] The New Law that’s Being Drafted States that if a Married Woman Wants an Abortion, She No Longer Needed that Consent from Her Husband

Wednesday, November 3, 2021

[New post] The New Law that’s Being Drafted States that if a Married Woman Wants an Abortion, She No Longer Needed that Consent from Her Husband

Respond to this post by replying above this line

The New Law that's Being Drafted States that if a Married Woman Wants an Abortion, She No Longer Needed that Consent from Her Husband

by taurusingemini

This is, brand new, so totally different, from the TEXAS heartbeat laws, a step forward for women's rights here, I'll say!!! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Focusing on Gender Equality, Getting Rid of the Discriminations, the Eugenics Health Laws Amending the Names, the Abortions of Teenage Girls, NO Longer on the Parents' Saying So

The eugenics health law is about to have a big change, the Department of Health & Sanitations last week asked along the experts from the various realms to discuss an amendment, other than changing the names of "Eugenic Healthcare Laws" to "Birthing Law Protection Act", and for the sake of protecting the rights of married woman to have births, they'd canceled the rules of how married woman, in getting an abortion, needed the consents of their, husbands, meaning, that if the wife wants an abortion, she didn't need her husband to sign off on it, and this may be a huge impact to the beliefs of traditional marriages.

The drafts of this new amendment will be set into motion earliest at the start of January, the Gynecology Medical Society Chairman, Huang stated, that it would cause great debate for married women to not get consent of their husbands on their abortions, that after the drafts of the amendment come into place, there's a need for the society's agreeing on this view.

what this signs said!

Another key point of this amendment focuses on the abortions of unwed teenage girls, if there were the disagreements on the matter with the legal guardians, it's no longer the parents' decisions solely. The head of National Health Department, Wu pointed out, whether or not the minors wanted to have an abortion, will be up to them to decide, the parents (legal guardians) should not go against the persons' wishes.

As for the abortions of the married women, no longer needed consents from their husbands, and this amendment caused great debates, there's no consensus agreed on the matters. Toward this, Wu told, that gender equality, equal rights for women, is now, a global, trend, and the country's already passed the "patients' right to choose", any medical procedures, will respect the individuals' wishes.

Wu told, that this amendment is major, and, the name had changed, because the former name, "Eugenics" is discriminatory, and it'd not fitted to the rights of the handicapped individuals anymore; and, in the discussions of this amendment, they will come together with the experts, to amend the laws on a more open, more progressive means, and, the formal posting of the law will be announced to the public at the earliest in January of next year, and, the department is currently collecting the advices from all around, to use the data as the basis of the amendments of the laws.

Huang told, that from a medical standpoint, the medical foundations are standing on the basis of respect for women, getting rid of gender inequality, and supportive of married women's needing consents from their husbands in abortions, based off of the statistics of insurance, it showed, that there are, more than twenty women per year who'd died due to childbirth, or complications from childbirth, if the pregnant woman can't choose whether or not to have an abortion based off of her physical conditions, it may not good for the mother, or the pregnancy.

And, unlike the heartbeat law in TX, this is, a step forward in women's rights, because we now are the ones, deciding whether or NOT we want an abortion, without your consents, and just because you fucking (so???) sons-of-bitches (not namecalling here, not the literal either!) are married to us, that still does NOT mean that you have the rights to decide, WHAT we do with OUR bodies, because, it's our rights to our own bodies, and if you want to, why don't YOU FUCKERS (and???) try and carry YOUR children full-term instead??? Oh wait, none of you are seahorse daddies or leaf dragons, nor do you have "pouches" like those, marsupials, do you? Nope! So, it's OUR bodies, OUR, choice here, and you don't got NO (oopsy, mark down another "double negative" here, why don't ya!!!) say in this!

This free site is ad-supported. Learn more