The law's more humane side, in considering that this case should NOT be tried by a jury, because it considered that it wouldn't be fitting, to put the families through what happened to their loved ones, again, and besides, the man who'd killed his brother got amputated, and will be in assisted living for the rest of his years…the more humane side of the law that's normally, cold is shown in this particular, case here…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
As the Younger Brother's Life Was Spared, He Was Amputated, Charged on Artificial Suicide, Admitted to His Wrongdoing, the District Attorneys and the Defense Shared the Beliefs on Giving Him a Reduction of Sentence
Another long-term care, tragedy. A pair of brothers in Tainan, the older, due to his illness, became, immobilized, and wasn't able to, work, the younger brother had been his sole caretaker for years on end, and became, tired physically and psychologically, the younger brother took his older brother to commit suicide, the neighbors found them, and notified the police, the older brother died, and the younger was spared, and now, he's being, indicted on artificial suicide charges, to prevent him from getting traumatized again, his attorney filed for the courts to not use a system of jurors, the Tainan District Court, based off of the context of the case, approved.
On February 6th of last year, the brothers didn't come out of their homes for the entire day, the neighbors found it to be odd, notified the police, and as the police came, and entered into the residence, they'd found the older brother, lying on his side, dead on the bathroom floors, the younger was still with a pulse, there were the charcoal found in the residence, after the younger brother was saved, he got his legs amputated, couldn't live on his own, and he was indicted on charges of artificial suicide by the district attorneys' office.
The attorney believed, that the man had been under long-term duress, that was unimaginable to the outside world, and needed more time to rehabilitate, to recover from his injuries, and had a mental condition a well, that if the process of trial by jury is set, considering the family's situation, the specifics of the man's illness will be known to the public by the press reporting, and this would be a damage on him a second time.
The district attorneys point out, that the defendant admitted to what he'd done truthfully, and the attorney only asked for his clients to be on probation, the district attorney was with no opinions of it. If the courts verified that this is not a trial by jury case, then, it could keep the family members from reexperiencing the traumas of what had happened. The families told the courts, that they'd hoped to use a regular trial case, and, begged the courts for a not-guilty verdict.
The Tainan District Court pointed out, that the defendant was asked to kill the deceased, out of promising him to, legally, this constitutes as artificial suicide, and, the terms serve in prison if convicted is one to seven years in prison. The defendant, due to how he was amputated now, is living in a nursing home currently, and, there's no chance of him, offending again, the courts' deciding on probation or free of serving a prison sentence objectively to the defendant, it makes no difference.
The D.A. argued that based off of the facts, if the probation terms is founded, if this would have an effect on the jury systems, that there's room for discussion of whether or not this case gets tried by a jury.
The Collectivist Courts pointed out, that the defendant and the families, had been greatly impacted by what had happened in this case, they feel the most profound, on the impacts of the crimes, that the courts should consider how the trial process would, impact the families, and, measure the sentence terms, then, the laws can get closer to the understanding of the people, and gain the trust of people, in that the laws will punish those who'd done, wrong.
The Collectivist Courts weighed the rights of the defendant, and the amount of efficacy in using the resources allotted to the case, believed, that it would be proper, if the system of jury would not be used.
And so, this is, how this man's killing his brother, because he'd become, too tried from taking care of him, and his own health conditions added to his stresses, that the courts considered the facts, and from a more humanitarian angle, decided to not have this case tried by the jury, because it saves the families from reexperiencing the traumas of losing their loved ones, of having to sit through the gruesome details of how the murder had occurred. So in this case, the laws became, more, humane…
No comments:
Post a Comment