Abused his own six-year-old son to death, and all he got was still, a slap on the wrist, only SIXTEEN years, it should be LIFE without ANY chances of PAROLE, for MURDERING his own young, on the sorry EXCUSE of, "discipline"…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
He'd, Beaten His Six-Year-Old with the Cloth Hangers, Forced Him to Stand in the Nude as Punishment, Soaking the Child in Hot Water to Get the Bruises Out, the Courts Affirmed the D.A.'s Office is Asking for the Most Severe Sentencing
The man, Hsu in Taichung, had multiple times hit his own six-year-old son with the hangers and the cords of the plugs, forced his young to strip and stand nude, he'd worried that the injuries he'd inflicted on the child may get found, told the six-year-old child to soak in a plastic tub of hot water to "reduce the bruising faster", for over an hour; and the six-year-old young boy passed out due to rhabdomyolysis, and drowned inside the container, the district attorneys charged the man with adult abusing an underage minor to death, the jurors sentenced Hsu heavily to sixteen years.
The key debate of the focus was in if Hsu's behaviors was "torturing causing death" or "involuntary manslaughter". After three days of examining the facts presented, in the end, the jurors took the stance of the district attorneys, found Hsu guilty for torturing a minor to death, and because he is a repeated offender in abuse, the jurors decided to add to his sentence, sixteen years was the maximum limit for this charge given.
The district attorneys claimed, that when the boy was only four, there'd been records on file for domestic violence, the social services mandated Hsu into the parenting lessons, but Hsu continued physically abusing his son, and he'd worried that he might get found out, kept taking his son out of school on absences, up to a total of forty-two days at a time; the coroners' autopsy showed, that the boy had a total of forty-two old and new injuries, large hematoma surface areas on him, which showed how Hsu grew worse in abusing his son, plus Hsu had prior records of serving time, he had almost no response for the sentence in deterring him from abusing his own son to death, the district attorneys asked the courts to sentence him heavily, and, asked for a total of thirteen years six months to sixteen years.
Hsu's attorney defended him, that Hsu didn't evade responsibilities of what he did, but because he wasn't educated enough, lacked the medical knowledge, did NOT see the errors in his means of reducing the bruising in his young, causing the rhabdomyolysis to occur, causing the young boy to drown to death, that at most, he was guilty of leaving his own son in the bathrooms alone, which caused the "accidental drowning", that he should be charged on negligent death, that the sentence at the most severe, should not exceed eleven years.
Hsu testified, that he'd gotten "too upset and physically disciplined his son" harder, but he'd, put the ointment on his child, later, as he saw his son being, severely injured, that was why he'd used the plastic container, filled the container up with hot water, "for the bruises to go away faster", and didn't know that he'd caused his own young son to drown.
Hsu's mother begged on her own son's behalf, "all parents love their own young", she'd used the corporal punishment methods to teach him when he was young too, "it's my fault, I'd, not been the right model for him", as Hsu heard his mother, he'd, melted down, and cried hard in court.
The thirty-eight year-old Hsu tortured his own young six-year-old son to death, at the end of last month, the jurors of Taichung heard the case for three days, with the Chinese Medical University Pediatric Department physicians, the coroners', the school instructors, the cohabiting partner of Hsu, Hsu's mother, to testify,
And so, this still showed, how, ABUSE is like GENETICS, passed down from one generation to the next, because the mother told the courts, that she'd, BEATEN the son up when he'd misbehaved himself as a kid, that was why, he'd used the, corporal punishment means to "train" his own young son to behave too, and sixteen years being the highest the offender is allowed to get for the charge of ABUSING a kid to death, that's still, NOT, heavy enough. I mean, how would you feel, that you'd been, ABUSED physically to death, on the EXCUSE of it being, "discipline", and the one who'd ABUSED you to DEATH, got away, with "accidentally MURDERING" you, huh? This is, unjust, and yet, that's how the law works, it doesn't still.
No comments:
Post a Comment