There's, this, baby koala in the zoo here, that's left without a mother, because the mother was ill due to acute leukemia, and the mother was, put down, but the baby is, being taken care of by the zookeepers, to ensure its wellbeing…

From a humanitarian angle, yeah, it's, a good thing, sure, but, from the evolutionary perspective, this baby koala is, destine to die, because it's, without the mother to carry it, to give it food, and that still just showed, how humans are, playing GOD, going AGAINST the nature of things, I mean, if nature intended this animal to survive, then, it will, but, given that its mother died, chances are, it's not going to, and, because we humans, overinterpreted into the matter, thinking, that oh, it's, another life, and we can't just, let it die, so we interfere, with nature, and that usually have, bad results.

查看來源圖片
humans are playing god still! Photo from online

And yet, there's, that "debate" of what's humane here, we can't just, let this, baby koala die, it didn't do anything wrong, it's not its fault, that its mother has leukemia, sure, but, if this occurred in nature, the outbreak, the WILD, then, this baby is still going to die, and, by intervening with the predestined fates of other living things, we are, playing G-O-D, aren't we, and that's, never going to end well!

So, the debate is still, ongoing, do we save a species from extinction, because, that's what, we are supposed to do, because it's the morally responsible thing (says W-H-O, huh???) and, wouldn't saving a species that's, destined to become, EXTINCT, because it'd, lacked the abilities to adapt and to survive, against nature???

I'll leave you all with that then…

 This free site is ad-supported. Learn more
​