taurusingemini posted: " On how to prevent yourselves, from getting, victimized after the two of you, break up, when those sexual photos had been, shot, during the time when you two are hitting it hot and, heavy! From the Front Page Sections, translated… The legislator,"
On how to prevent yourselves, from getting, victimized after the two of you, break up, when those sexual photos had been, shot, during the time when you two are hitting it hot and, heavy! From the Front Page Sections, translated…
The legislator, Kao beaten by her boyfriend to injury, although the man is already in police custody, but, there's a chance that the photos of intimacy of the two had gone, viral. This showed, that the law is lacking, in protecting the rights of the abused, when the abuser holds the photos of intimacy of the victims, are the laws which are set up currently, enough, to protect the rights of the, victims?
Based off of Penal Cod 315, Section 1.2, those who illegally tapes, photographs, or using any other means to secretly film another in private activities, is punishable by a three-year sentence maximum. And, this stated, that if the two are dating, then, it's easily interpreted as that there's the agreeing to getting secretly filmed, taped, and this is going to cause problems. While, after the breakup, to prevent the images, the footages from leaking out, is there a right to ask the individual to delete all the records, this will become problematic as well. To prevent the issues of invasions of privacy after the break up, the recordings without the other party's concerns, are all included in the voyeur clause.
no way to prevent this! Photo from online
As based off of Penal Code 315-2, Section 3, those who spread the contents of the recordings, will be sentenced to no more than five years in prison, this isn't lenient, and not considered as accusation cases, but, does it need to have the preset of being secretly filmed, if the victim didn't press charges on being secretly filmed, the individual who'd streamed the footages online, will s/he be charged of this count, then, there would be, discrepancies. Basing off of a stricter definition, it needed to have the fact that the individuals were, secretly filmed for the preset, otherwise, spreading the footages, will only be charged with Penal Code 235, spreading lewd photos.
Spreading of lewd photos is not a chargeable crime, but, the laws gave it two years and less jail term to the offenders, which is considered a slap on the wrists. And, on the matter of spreading out the photos of intimacy on the counts, and, the sexual intercourse between the man and woman, would constitute as molestations, and wouldn't that be, damaging the victims repeatedly.
To resolve the matter, there's need to define the spread of lewd photos into act, at least, raise up the sentence terms to five years and less, and the charges of spreading the sexually-illicit photos, and all of these needed to get adjusted in wordings of the law, to prevent the victims from getting offended repeatedly again.
And, there's, the matter of statutory period too, how to prevent these photos of sexual intimacies from leaking out is worth considering. Especially with the current domestic violence prevention, only limited to the physicality of the abused, and the individuals' personal freedoms, toward the behaviors of spreading the photos, the law only sets a restraining order against such acts, but, the victims may not know the identity of the individuals spreading the photos, let alone, asking the courts for that needed restraining order and in the end, the victims can only rely on the criminal charges to prevent the spread of such photos.
On the matter of handling the matter as criminal offense, confiscating, although this included all the hard drives, but, does it also, include the platforms of which the photos were, uploaded to, or the social media too, there's, the definition of such needed, in legal terms, to the point of if it'd, obstructed the freedom of speech too. Even if the confiscations of such materials had been conducted by force, in the internet eras, how to prevent the setting up of an alternative account to spread the is an even harder to tackle problem, and this will be, a hot potato that the legislators need to, look into more.
And so, there are, still, a lot of shortcomings to this, anti-stalking law, to prevent the violence of intimate partners, and, there's the matter of the sexually illicit photos you took of each other, because you want to share that part of your selves, with the other person, because the two of you are, in love, not realizing, that HEY, if and when we break up, those materials can be used, against me, but hey, you don't realize that, not when you're, hot and heavy with each other, in L-O-V-E, which made you easy targets.
WordPress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment