[New post] The Wife Illegally Surveilled the Husband’s Cheating, He Was Found Not Guilty & Didn’t Need to Pay
taurusingemini posted: " Caught her husband, cheating, with evidence she'd taped down, and yet, because she'd taped him without his consent, she was sued! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated… The woman, Su found her husband Lee was cheating on her, she'd secretly" Mirroring the World
Caught her husband, cheating, with evidence she'd taped down, and yet, because she'd taped him without his consent, she was sued! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The woman, Su found her husband Lee was cheating on her, she'd secretly filmed him, with the affair, as she'd collected enough evidence, she'd sued, and asked for $600,000N.T.s; Lee claimed, that the spousal right does NOT involving possession of love, and the video recordings aren't enough to prove anything; the judge believed that the spousal rights are protected, but Su's illegally taping her husband's conversation was a invasion of privacy, that the voice recordings aren't enough to prove anything, found Su lost, that she will be paying for the $6,500 N.T. in the court proceedings, this can still be appealed.
Su claimed, that she'd married Lee in 2014, in October of 2020, Lee met a woman, Lo, the two of them had gone to spend the nights together, and had sexual intercourses during those times out. She'd learned of this in May of 2021, filed for divorce on August 23rd of the same year, and sued him for money.
Lee claimed, that Su without his consent, set up the sound recording devices at home and in his car, had long-term surveilled his nonpublic activities, that she'd impacted his right to privacy, that she'd gotten the evidence illegally; and the spouses are individuals, and independent of each other, that there should not be the possessiveness of one belonging, solely to the other person.
The court judge believed, that decriminalizing adultery does NOT mean that the law took away the rights of the spouses, but to ensure the rights of the spouses by the laws, Lee and Lo denied that there was the spousal rights, clearly, they'd misunderstood the protection clause of this law.
this would be, ILLEGAL, without the consent of those being caught!
photo from online
The spouse, in order to prove that her/his rights had been breached, can try to collect, and save the evidences, but, reviewing o'er Su's taped recording sessions, Su wasn't one of the party recorded, and, recording someone without the consents IS, against the laws of privacy and communication protections.
Su only provided the recording for two days as evidence to sue her husband, but the recording device, didn't just record what the defendant was saying, so long as the battery is still working, no matter who said what, it all gets, caught on, tape, the courts found, that she'd, illegally, tape recorded the conversations of others without their knowing, that she'd illegally recording others' conversations long-term, that she'd impacted the laws of invasions of privacy greatly, that the evidence she'd provided the courts aren't valid as evidence of her husband's cheating.
And yeah, so what are we supposed to do, when we suspect that our spouses are cheating on us??? We must HIRE that private investigator, because at least, those DUDES or DUDETTES have the licensures, and even IF they get caught, they won't get sued for invasion of privacy, and this is just SHIT, how the government protects the party and the party's WHORE who are doing the wrong things, and punishes the woman who's been, cheated on, because SHE suspected that her man was unfaithful to her, and this is all in part of how the government had DE-criminalized the charges of ADULTERY.
And we now must, work our best, to collect these evidences that are valid in court, to PROVE that our husbands had been, cheating, sleeping around with their, WHORES!
No comments:
Post a Comment