"He who controls the past, controls the future," wrote a young Georgian radical called Joseph Jughashvilli in 1930. He is better known to history as Stalin – the man of Steel; his point was that terrorism, propaganda, fear of retribution and untrammelled media access [he was a politically ideological newspaper editor by trade] could re-write history so comprehensively as to make the rewrite a form of lock-stepping totally accepted by the coming generation.
Thus, by the time of his death in 1953, he was The Great Helmsman and Hero of Victory in the Patriotic War against fascists that the West still calls the Second World War. In fact, that invented past is nonsense: so utterly had the paranoiac Uncle Joe purged the Red Army of any and all threats to him [and signed a cynical pact to divide Poland with the Nazis] he came within a whisker of being annihilated by Hitler's Operation Barbarossa: the Wehrmacht was in the suburbs of Moscow before the Russian Winter saved Stalin (below right as a young radical bank-robber) in the same manner it had doomed Napoleon.
The failure of dictatorial command ideological regimes is summed up with exquisite irony by the Russian refusenik Aleksander Solzhynetsin in his novella We Never Make Mistakes. I have held the view – throughout an up-and-down seventy-six years of life - that failure produces infinitely more wisdom than the conflated praise that clings like a mendacious magnet to "success" in its fashionable popularity.
In this context, I would draw your attention to an excellent analysis by Jefferson Morley from August 2023, entitled – would you believe? - How the CIA controls the Past, specifically regarding the JFK Assassination just over six decades ago.
I am not trying in any way to present myself as the close intimate of Spooks for half a century….most of the "Truth" I found came as a lucky melange of career accidents and listening without bias to committed, open-minded empiricists and stand-up comics.
My overriding point, however, is that – whichever way you cut it – you couldn't insert a sub-atomic particle between Stalinism in the USSR, and the surveillance bloc that is EUNATO today. The only difference between the two is that the 21st century equivalent is armed with a technology Comrade Stalin could only have had wet dreams about.
Like so many before them, the CIA>>Pentagon>> emergencist >> central bank set>> hegemonist>>bent bourse>> Silicon Valley>> Multinational Monopolist complex hasn't used the Stalinist horror as a warning: rather, it sees the possibilities as a blueprint for total control ad infinitum
None of the United States, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, European Union and People's Republic of China enjoy any of the vital building bricks that make for guarantees of Citizen Rights, the Rule of Law and Equality Before the Law – without which they have no right whatsoever to proclaim themselves as functioning Free Speech Democracies.
Some examples at random will serve to hammer the point home:
The CIA has no right at all, given the nature of its Charter, to effect surveillance and phone tapping of US citizens. But it does it anyway….and woe betide any elected official who objects to this….even if he's the President, he'll be slaughtered in broad daylight
The Russian Federation's Constitution declares boldly at the outset that 'We, the multinational people of the Russian Federation, united by a common fate on our land, establishing human rights and freedoms, civic peace and accord, preserving the historically established state unity, proceeding from the universally recognized principles of equality and self-determination of peoples, revering the memory of ancestors who have conveyed to us the love for the Fatherland, belief in the good and justice, reviving the sovereign statehood of Russia and asserting the firmness of its democratic basic, striving to ensure the well-being and prosperity of Russia, proceeding from the responsibility for our Fatherland before the present and future generations, recognizing ourselves as part of the world community, adopt the Constitution of Russian Federation'.
Although its elections match and often exceed the promises made for POTUS elections in the United States and United Kingdom's General Elections, in 2015, RF legislation was reviewed to make participation in protests punishable with up to five years imprisonment. Under this law, the number of political prisoners is ever rising in Russia. There have been mass arrests occurring in response to peaceful demonstrations during that period. Protests against the conscription introduced in that year resulted in thousands of arrests – albeit because of opposition to EUNATO's broken promises in relation to the 2014 ceasefire in Ukraine - but that doesn't excuse the decision to give Presidents power above Constitutional Rule of Law.
The United Kingdom currently offers obeisance to Rishi Sunak, a Prime Minister for whom the British People not only never voted, not even his Conservative Party gave him a seal of approval in any shape or form: he owes his home at Ten Downing Street to nothing more a lack of of other candidates who might represent some form of Duality in the sense of an alternative Resistance. The British mainstream media has been silenced to the point where it's really just an arse-licking offshoot of MI6.
From Day One of the European Union, its main creator Jean Monnet [left] the French politician and economic adviser, was a lifelong supporter of European integration, whose ideas inspired the Schuman Plan to unite French and German national production of coal and steel under a single banner. He envisaged the "ever closer Union of EU States" as a Third Bloc to join the Americans and Russians...without paying too much attention to the PRC Beijing stranglehold on hitech software, and its near monopolous grip on pharmaceutical supply chains.
Notably, however, he turned the Democratic principle upside down, the better to stop EU citizens [his words here, by the way] from "making mistakes" in EU elections.
If you don't see that as what one might call the EUSSR, then you aren't paying attention.
Beijing's biggest idea following the death of Majo Dung in 1979 was to force through a one-child-per-family policy. It takes a special kind of controlling sociopath to stop people from reproducing, but China pressed ahead with a mixture of stick and carrot - methods of enforcement included making various contraceptive methods widely available, offering financial incentives and preferential employment opportunities for those who complied, imposing sanctions (economic or otherwise) against those who violated the policy, and, at times (especially in the early 1980s), invoking stronger measures such as forced abortion and sterilisation (the latter primarily of women).
The long term backfire was twofold. First, the country's overall sex ratio became skewed toward males, because traditionally in China, male children have been preferred—particularly in rural areas—as sons are responsible for the care of elderly parents. When most families were restricted to one child, having a girl became highly undesirable, resulting in a rise in abortions of female babies, and even infanticide of baby girls. Second, the age demographic of elderly people ballooned, the result of the a rise in longevity since 1980. The great majority of senior citizens relied on their children for support after they retired, and there were fewer children to support them – to be precise, almost 400 million less. (No doubt, the charmless Henry Kissinger would have referred to the wrinklies as "useless eaters").
But then, this is what tends to happen to ordinary people when one puts ideological systemicists in charge of mandated social planning.
Up until maybe fifteen years ago, my life was full of assumptions that still hold good for a disturbingly high percentage of the human race. The Sun headline of this compliance could be summarised as follows:
"In order to protect my country, we have to accept that James Bond 007 and his ilk are necessary if our values are to be preserved"
Then I discovered the Born Again hard-edged US stand-up King George Carlin who declared to a startled nation that he had "One simple rule when listening to what the Government has to say….I don't believe any of it – not one fucking word".
He was right. And this is where it gets potentially very interesting, because slowly – indeed almost imperceptibly - more and more Russian, American, British, EU and Chinese citizens furthest down the social ladder are saying "Free-speech democracy or 'People's Republic', it's a sham: they're all the same: the country is run by those who refuse to face elections because they despise us, and have an unhealthy desire for above-the-law power to bully."
Which leads us on to another almost ever-present feature of the Swamp-dwellers: their unhealthy desires. The correlation between the desire to be all-powerful and kinky sexuality is impossible to ignore:
Majo Dung [left] was an infamous paedophile, the most influential of the EU leaders Emmanuel Macron has a Caligula complex along with widely recognised negroid homosexual leanings, Joe Biden took inappropriate showers with his sub-teen daughter, Hitler was a scatalogical masochist whose needs led to the suicide of this cousin Geli Raubel, Stalin's security boss Lavrentiy Beria was a sex maniac who raped then murdered his victims (over fifty of them), and the Monday Club Tory elite have been making odd and occasionally bestial visits to Amsterdam for the best part of thirty years. Tony Blair was done for loitering in a public lavatory, gave a false name to Plod and still got away with it. Leo O'Vodka the EU Irish stooge did more than his fair share of cruising and fisting over the years, and of course Harriet Harmperson infamously referred to paedophilia as "merely another part of the sexual rainbow"...almost as bad as David Steele referring to Cyril Smith's long term seedy paedophilia as "a bit of harmless slapping".
I suppose I met and/or worked with some 150 or so MPs during a forty-year career in advertising. My overall sense is that it's a very good thing most voters rarely have any contact with legislators, because if they did the electoral turnout would drop by 75% overnight. In a word, they are - almost to the last man and woman – bombasts. Bullies [there's that word again] who hide their poor briefing and lack of ideas by shouting a lot as if this might make up for their very obvious bigotry: it is at times almost as of they are dipped daily into a vat of mediocrity. There were exceptions along the way – but not many. And not all the dummies were lobby-fodder: one Health Minister with whom I worked, for example, thought oral sex was kissing. It led to a very complicated and somewhat hilarious meeting on the subject of advertising targetting bisexuals.
Notable exceptions to my general rule were John Redwood, whom I enjoyed meeting immensely, and Kate Hooey who has more common sense in her toenails than most lawmakers have in their entire body, including the brain. Neither of them [it goes without saying] ever held the High Office they thoroughly deserved.
But generally, it's very easy to see how the unelected Sir Humphreys of this world (most especially those employed in anything called CIA, Pentagon, GCHQ, Sureté , FBI, Special Branch, NKVD, MI5, MI6, Sicherheits Dienst and so on) quickly filled the vacuum left by the ordinary Lawmakers who were variously corrupted, threatened and in some cases – notably Airy Neave the Tory security Minister – planted by MI6 in the first place, as a result of which he was assassinated by the IRA.
In the US, George Bush Sr [left] made it all the way to the Oval Office denying he was CIA, even though he had been part of the Firm since 1952.But they're not that smart when it comes down to it. They've had a lot of help along the way in the long, medium and short term from a gradual realisation in the early 1950s that NATO had several folks batting for the other side (notably the UK diplomat Kim Philby in both senses of the term along with his coven at Cambridge); the McCarthyism that blacklisted suspected Communists in Hollywood; and the Anglo-American Manahatten A-Bomb scientists - college-educated Americans and Brits - ideologically motivated, enamoured of communist beliefs, and a more general geopolitical belief motivated by the notion of nuclear parity, ie, they reasoned that the best way to prevent a nuclear war was to adopt MAD [Mutually Assured Destruction] and make sure that nobody would start a war with MAD parity.
Their reasoning with hindsight was, to my mind, correct; unfortunately, the lunatics in today's secret services never saw the dark comedy movie Dr Strangelove, and have varietal ideas about how to achieve giga-genocide in myriad other ways.
At around this time – late Fifties, early Sixties – paranoia about "the Bomb" was at its height. Having started out as a hawk in facing up to the Soviet threat [new President John F Kennedy had been told by the Pentagon that the USSR had more missiles than the USA, which was a lie] there was nevertheless an awareness that gaining ascendancy in the Superpower Struggle wasn't going to be a tickling contest.
Contrary to what the Dallas killers thought, JFK didn't shirk his responsibility to shout for freedom across all of Europe. He went to West Berlin and said "Ich bin ein Berliner" [It actually means "I am a doughnut" but it still resonated] and it was Kruschev who blinked first in the Cuban missile crisis. (Kennedy suggested that if he took his Cuban toys back home, NATO would dismantle its missiles in Turkey, later telling his brother Robert, "Those bastards at the Pentagon never told me we even had ICBMs in Turkey".)
In reality, the scrambled-egg Clowns in Big P had told him a pack of lies about the Missile Gap, the Bay of Pigs anti-Castro success chances, and hidden from him the missiles in Turkey. They were outright traitors to the Constitution and could have been put on trial: and the CIA didn't like the idea of that….their view was already that JFK was the traitor here (they knew through bugging that Kennedy planned to evacuate all US military personnel from Vietnam after the '64 Election) and firmly believed that the US could win a hot war against the Sovyets.
I was once privileged to listen to a bugged Oval Office phone call wherein the apparently limp-wristed POTUS [in oils, right] minces no words with a hard hat 5-star general closing with the words, "Call it whatever you want in the way of a 'procedural error' General, I'll tell you what it is, it's a fuck-up, that's what it is...Good day to you sir". Another cold warrior who agreed with the CIA's view was LBJ, the man whose Dixiecrat inflence had carried Texas and the south as Kennedy's running mate. To say he was implicated in the Dallas assassination is rather like saying Stalin just might have had some explaining to do about Trotsky's murder.
Texas Governor Connally was a long-standing LBJ crony, whom Johnson phoned no fewer than seven times in the month before the Dallas JFK visit begging his friend not to sit in the Presidential limo. When the VP's mistress met him just after the shooting, and asked why the mid-town traffic was backed up to hell, Johnson observed quietly, "We ain't gonna have to take no more shit from them Kennedy boys". Interviewed at the end of his life, Dick Nixon observed, "Johnson and I both wanted to be President, I just wasn't prepared to kill for it".
Pretty much the entire Secret State and the Mob were involved in the assassination, from the 'Patsy' Lee Oswald's killer Jack Ruby via the FBI's crude attack on the Zapruder film of the event to the CIA plan to have the motorcade slow down to make the bullets that killed the President – presenting a "can't miss" opportunity for the shooter beneath that kirbside drainage grid.
November 1963 was the start of psychopathy's long road to render Free-Speech US, UK and EU democracy a sick joke. But the process of acceleration producing the perfect storm to finally neuter it completely became increasingly dependent over time on several interrelated factors: digital manipulation, bourse investment giants, concentration of those giants in media influence, and the use of models to fake results of every kind alongside declining education standards and the addictive use of smartphones by innocent people unaware of the ballooning surveillance State.
Long before the coming of the deadly internet, however, America's Unelected Security infiltrators had their eyes on Hollywood as a great Big Screen opportunity. The arrival of the US into World War II as the classic movie Casablanca was in mid-production drove its star Humphrey Bogart close to distraction as his character Rick was transformed overnight into a quasi-OSS hero - as indeed the emphasis on Claude Rains as a cynical Vichy police-chief was toned down because the French were now US allies. The fresh-faced Secret Service boys changed the ending so many times about Rick's lost love (Ingrid Bergman), for light relief Bogey would arrive on the set each morning asking, "Sho guysh, is she getting' on the fucken plane or not?". (He later told the African Queen Director John Huston that Bergman's breath smelt, adding, "And trusht me John, I should know".)
But in his own real life, Bogart detested the counterfeit. In more ways than one,the eventual ending of Casablanca remains a metaphor for how common decency and courage has been replaced by cynical manipulation and appalling screenwriting: thus, the scene where Viktor Lazlow drowns out the Nazis singing Deutchland uber Alles still makes me blub copiously, but Rains chucking a bottle of Vichy water in the litter bin as Humprey Bogart parrots "Louis, I think thish could be the shtart of a beautiful relationship" is truly awful, lacking only a pointing fist+finger emoji on-screen saying "These are the good guys".
Fast forward to the Vietnam War, it's 1968 and actor/patriot John Wayne stars in and helps direct The Green Berets, an awful pot-boiler with more plonky chords in it than a honky-tonk in a cat-house, but nevertheless still the work of a well-meaning American who very genuinely thought expansionist China needed to be stopped...and who am I to say he was wrong?
Let me explain a chance encounter that informed such seemingly throwaway remarks: an all-too brief relationship I had in Paris with Dr Phuong Guyenne greatly educated my two-dimensional former Student view of the Vietnam War….and Phuong's own suffering at the hands of what history is gradually grasping about Ho Chi Min: he was a Chinese puppet in the same mould as Zelenskyy in contemporary Ukrainian ambitions...that's to say, a thinly disguised whore used by EUNATO to pretend that Vlodomore Z is the Nice Guy is no different to Ho Chi Min covering for the raving paedophile Majo Dung
I hope my point here is getting through – viz, as the heading to this post insists – we must stop simplistically taking sides, and start taking action capable of ridding our world of this infinitesimal disturbed 0.03% who cause endless death and trouble purely to sculpt their murderous fantasies into something horribly real and dystopian.
In short, I don't give a good Goddamn any more about those who squabble about the Land of the Free versus The Marxist dialectic: ideology is bunk, and whether the fiat currency promise is to pay 9$US or ¥9China, they are both equal in their counterfeit con-trick.
Is counterfeit too strong a term? No, I think not: as Mark Twain wrote, "There is no thing harder to achieve than adhesion to new science that rejects what you learned at your mother's knee." [Remember, the Covid psycho's endless repetition of "We're just following the science? Turns out they weren't following any proven science at all].
You saw the movie All the President's Men perhaps? Woodward was the rooky good guy determined to get nasty Tricky Dicky the Bill of Rights perverter out of the Oval Office….right?
Wrong. Woodward wasn't a journo at all: he was working for Naval Intelligence and was foisted onto Ben Bradlee at The Washington Post. Why? Because Richard Nixon was asking a lot of awkward questions about who killed JFK.
Nixon positively idolised Jack Kennedy and only ever referred to him as "Mr President" or the formal first name of "John". This admiration was fully returned. From the Quora site:
'JFK liked and admired Nixon. Their friendship continued throughout JFK's life. "On New Year's Eve 1959, two days before he announced his candidacy for the presidency, Kennedy made an admission to his neighbour, journalist Charles Bartlett, that was so startling Bartlett wrote it down the following morning: "Jack says if the Democrats don't nominate him, he's going to vote for Nixon."'
On his first day in the Oval Office, the 1968 incarnation of President Nixon rang the legendary veteran FBI bigot J Edgar Hoover and said (words to this effect) "I think you know who killed John, and I want this stain on our democracy removed forever". This set alarm bells clanging in Arlington and Langley Virginia, and across every news desk in Washington….which is how Bob Woodward got assigned to the WAPO…. The same WAPO which in the intervening decades has become a standing joke among the Hill's press detail as "the inhouse magazine for the CIA".
For further elucidation watch Nixon on the subject on YouTube. I personally found his testimony entirely credible.
The same process was becoming increasingly common in the UK; most notably "journalist" Con Coughlin at the UK Daily Telegraph, who had no answer to the following RT article in 2018:
'That a free press underpins British democracy is an enduring myth that has been allowed to go unchallenged, up there with unicorns and the Loch Ness Monster. Because if a clutch of right-wing reactionary billionaires owning the bulk of a nation's major newspaper titles and media constitutes a free press, the word 'free' has been stripped and shorn of all meaning. Yet, while the aforementioned – let's be kind here – 'anomaly' has long been understood by anyone of adult years with the ability to put their underpants on the right way round in the morning, the extent to which the British establishment press and media has been penetrated by intelligence services and acts as a conduit for their agenda is less well known.'
Of course, in and of itself that piece by John Wight writing for Russia Today six years ago is ideologically biased….but still spot on the detail: the Poodle MSM in the UK has become increasingly uninformed – and uninvestigative – since Contrick19 and the useless mRNA "vaccine" were foisted upon an unsuspecting public after 2020.
But again I preach: don't wast your energy taking sides, take an uncompromising pledge NOT to comply.
Which is how we segue into the acceleration of information overload along with Tech Valley dishonesty….
Digital Photoshop
"Special Effects" – once I started out in proper grown-up market research and planned advertising communications – were seen by most of us as an unalloyed gift from Heaven in the shape of a development known simply as 'Hari': image manipulation in one case I was involved in allowed an older [albeit minor] character actor who had died during the shoot to "come back to life" by taking clips of his minor scenes on the set by re-syncing his lip movements to fit a relevant product claim. As with so much new technology, one was blown away by the staggering technical achievement but all too blind to the broader consequences….and in that sense, I was no more aware than the others.
Before we knew it, the phrase, "Don't worry, we can Hari that in later" became an all-too-common phrase in ad agency pre-prods [Pre-production meetings to keep clients reassured that the ad agency would deliver the script as signed off by the Brand Manager].
I never did remember what Hari stood for; but with hindsight – a wonderful thing – it was the precursor to presenting nonsense as science by the ideological rigidity of educators convinced of something called "Settled Science".
Everything is either right or wrong
Left-leaning (soi-disant liberal) educators who underwent teacher-training degrees during the 1960s produced – on the whole – rigid, pc-soaked compliant education systems in the First World – most notably in France, but also in (West) Germany, the UK and the USA, where A's were given for "correct" acceptance of socio-cultural norms and fashions. Before that time, creative and well-sourced questionning of contemporary philosophies was what won a First or 2:1 degree upon leaving University. Now everything must have a right or wrong answer (notoriously so under the French system, where for example questioning the political structure of the 'single market' [later EU] would attract a near automatic Fail.)
Western culture became not so much democratic as demagogic - with those "in charge" become self-satisfied Demigods dictating what was Godly and Good...and woe betide anyone telling French enarcs, American Democrats or radical feminists that they were talking tripe. Compliance in the face of – and lack of critique of insane content – has given us the Labour Party's Looney Left, Following the Science, Joe Biden as US President, Feminists smashing urinals, Macronite "centrism", the rabid demonisation of Vladimir Putin, gongs for Pharma freaks who developed bioweapons and sold them as vaccines, turbo cancers, Covid19 as the Scourge of Mankind, Preparing for Disease X, face masks that were pointless against an airborne virus, the Microsoft operating system, modelled climate predictions and "natural" Hawaiian heat storms burning tree-trunks from the inside out.
Investment Goliaths and financialised capitalism
Neoliberal "Greed is Good" Bourse-biased service business capitalism dominated and controlled by vast investment houses is a busted flush, and most neocon foreign policy is designed to distract from that reality.
Although the former UK Prime Minister and Chancellor Gordon Brown mouthed the immortally inane cliché "Glooble prorblems requwyer Glooble sorlushiorns" – to a degree that made him sound like the Turkey he was: viz, a clucking glooble glooble glooble from the Front Bench, and this obsession with globalobalobbalism as the inevitable future gave him away as a supposed financial genius who was really just another settled-science Woodentop.
Brown ended up having this saintly aura around himself as "Britain's greatest ever Chancellor", but even the most cursory analysis shows that the only person promoting that image was, um, Gordon himself.
Globalist problems in fact need to start from the finding that globalist totalitarian Planetary control is the diametric opposite of what's required. But all the Great Scottish Man from the Manse did was simply repair the tramlines of neoliberal Groupthink to make the Black Rock Leviathans eventual ability to control the media through investment blackmail a near certainty. [He also sold literally tons of UK gold reserves at the bottom of the cycle, and his motives for so doing have never been the subject of a satisfactory media investigation. But then, as one rare EU mole confided to me in 2015, "There's no mainstream market any more for journalism that shatters illusions Wardy….people want reassuring words now, not catatonic searches for Truth".
Reassurance of ignorant assumption in the context of "correct" education makes for soil rich in the acceptance of cod pseudo-science handed out by Secret States on a mission to reinvent the past. Once the history has been Deified and the Hero of the Hour glorified by neutering genuinely investigative media, Free speech Democracy has left the theatre.
The Black Rocks have stoned genuinely doubting social and 'mainstream media' to death….and the dangerously swollen naked power of the Big Six has met media concentration at exactly the right time to ensure that they feed each other with consummate ease.
Global Control of the MSM and social media
A mere fifteen years ago, it took in the order of 17,000 phone calls and corrupt quid-pro-quo 'contra deals' to stop a genuinely serious State crime from being found out and brought into Court….for example, the astonishing number of lone-driver deaths from automobile accidents in the Clintons' Home State of Arkansas.
Compare and contrast that process with the "acceptable reality" being dished out shamelessly by the lapdogs of today's lockstep legacy media, and increasing levels of outrageous censorship on many social media "platforms". This effect can be achieved – and blatant Truths covered up – by making at most five calls to one or more of the Investment House giants who need only threaten to withdraw share-value support to a press title to ensure the media owner spikes any story the 0.03% don't like.
Digital falsification.
But while the concentration of investment House power has created the most successful shut-down of critical Opeds in media history – a veritable 'Party Line' – the ability to support a cover-up by planting lies, changing dates and tampering with digital photographs has produced (in already compliant, dumbed-down western electorates) a series of dishonest 'on message' misrepresentations of the real nature of Global Pharma selling Death as Survival. This led to a series of idiotic PR cockups by the Royal family in relation to the health of both the King and his daughter-in-law, the ramifications of which are still to be felt in full.
Whichever way you cut it, the Royal House of Windsor finds itself this weekend in a depth of doodoo not seen since Edward VIII's abdication in 1936. The Windsor dynasty's cul de sac is twofold:
1. The Royals were devious in their silence on any connection between Charles III and Princess Catherine [formerly Kate Middleton] receiving their Pfizer 'booster' jabs on the same day and their time-twinned development of turbo-cancer soon afterwards. Not only did the King flatly refuse to discuss his specific cancer type, his daughter-in-law went into hiding, talking only of "abdominal surgery"….as indeed did the King's son and heir William. Eschewing the route of alerting their innocent citizenry with commendable honesty, Buckingham Palace chose instead to collaborate with the genocidal New World Order...thus condemning thousands of Brits to death.
2. Worse still, Princess Catherine then used digital photo manipulation to project an image of "Happy royal mother facing a future of full recovery". Brave digital expert detectives on social media then quickly showed that the image was counterfeit, and for the first time in months, the future Queen on live video apologised for the deception….looking thin, decidedly tired and self-admittedly in the process of chemotherapy to combat aggressive cancer.
Republican [English version] forces have thus been given a free hand to propagandise the Windsors' behaviour in terms of "There you are...we told you so – they're just another dimension of the superiority complex depopulators from Wall Street via Langley and the Gates Motel to Davosite Hollywood idiots and Dystopian fans of sapienocide".
Silicon Valley & the 24/7 Spyphone
Every cack-handed cover-up attempt will have bad consequences for the Psychotic nutters if or when they're found out. But what lies ahead when every smart and ethical expert is too frightened to reveal an ultimate provenance?
Compare and contrast the independent expert photoshop courage described in the above sub-head content with the gutless megalomania of the AI Billionaires in Silicon Valley. Frankly, the above-the-law giga-power of the latter to threaten, bully and terrify the former brings one back to George Orwell's belief expressed in 1948 that "the future we do not as yet see is one largely comprising uncontrolled power of the jackboot to step on every human face".
From the moment that Big Business and the Valley of the Trolls grasped the infinite power of gathering sensitive personal data, Hitech became the low cunning of inventing more and more excuses to collect the evidence of 'dangerous' and 'gullible' people to be silenced or exploited respectively.
Their blind acceptance of power way beyond the Rule of Law is easily recorded and impossible to overstate. There is and never will be a credible defence of how they knowingly muddied the waters around Covid19, allowed the public to be reassured by the hidden killer dimension of mRNA vaccines, while predicting Disease X and – by far the most dangerous attack on citizen rights – the ability to track, trace and monitor every human on the planet via the seemingly harmless Smartphone that is anything but a plaything….and is now almost ubiquitous on at least four continents.
Returning to the Ben Bradlee era of relative WAPO innocence in the Nixon years, the Smartphone is indeed multi-talented: in one portable product form, in that it acts as a 24/7 spy, a distraction, a narcissists' endless Selfie, an obsessively anti-social addiction and the most invasive track-and-trace mechanism in history. Whoever and wherever you are, the CIA can - by reading a message emitted from your Smartphone - pinpoint exactly where you are in 7.8 seconds.
An Action Plan
Going back some 5,500 words to the start of this Magnum Opus, I titled the post, "Don't take sides, Take Action".The ability of the 0.03% self-appointed to threaten, bribe, silence, act without care for Civil Rights, Revalue our money digitally in their favour, track and trace us and – above all – rewrite the Past to glorify themselves and demonise their enemies must be cast to the four winds.Even as I write, over the last three days the presence of EUNATO troops in Ukraine and Crimea has become an "unhappening". It was all "fake news" you see...another devilish Putin trick to make him look good. It's not that the Western MSM are denying that EUNATO military personnel are now on the battlefield, it's um, just that they refuse to talk about it. Because, er, you see, Zelenskyy the brave Man of the Colombian Marching Powder decided on his own to take the initiative, found some spare cash in the attic, and launched a full-on offensive in Crimea. Without any help from anyone. The way you do.
Once again, only the courageous open-minded false-flag investigators have examined videos, casting enormous doubt on claims that Moscow had no idea the Rock Concert slaughter was being planned, and tracing the midwifery that has been practised by the CIA to ensure constant rebirths of the terrorist "power" of Hamas, ISIS and Al Quaida. All three of these terrorist groups were trained and then used by the CIA and Pentagon goons to up the "evidence" trail that began with 9/11.
On the other hand a simple question: hands up all readers who can state clearly what the 2014 Russo-Ukrainian ceasefire terms were and who first began a murderous campaign to heat it up again?
Answer: Washington has been giving help to Zelenskyy's attacks on Russian-speaking Ukrainians for ten years; and the Pentagon has been developing seven bioweapon research centres since at the latest 2018. And finally, Washington moved the goalposts some four years ago by bringing in the Crimea and its longstanding Russian Black Sea Fleet as a process of forced "annexation". Poppycock….and there is no historical claim that holds water for Ukraine to claim any ownership rights in Crimea.
Online exhortations almost always fall on deaf ears because – as this extended Weekend Essay has tried to enumerate – distraction, poor education, modelled warming agitation, investment bourse powers created by Wall Street and its Central Bank allies, and the perverted power of digital science to steal money, falsify photographic evidence and present global surveillance of The People as a fun toy everyone must have.
But at last, cracks are appearing in the Walls of Jericho. Furthermore, nothing succeeds like success. We are obliged - as Homo sapiens members with technical, data, musical and writing skills – to deliver the provenance that starts a panic among the Fat Controllers.
To hell with the Queensberry Rules; those who would be Demigods are simply not frightened enough. This is now a bare-knuckle scrap in which everything including head-butting and repeated kicks in scrotal sacs are justified.
Key Actions and Reforms
1. Neoliberal globalist capitalism should be dumped, along with the central banking system, in favour of mutualised entrepreneurial capitalism whose sole aim is decentralised power and socio-economic self-sufficiency
2. Currency digitalisation must be resisted with all the means at our disposal
3. Take all legacy and social media ISPs back from Bourse quotation into non-convertible mutual ownership
4. Tailor our education systems to offer a greater emphasis on non-ideological history and practical training in making things.
5. Cut the House of Commons MP numbers by 25%, scrap the House of Lords and replace it with a House of Communities, abolish First Past the Post as a voting system in favour of a proper, grown-up functional form of Proportional Representation
6. Cut Whitehall numbers by 60% and give most of its powers to the House of Communities
7. Remove all except local community administrators from the NHS and transfer its charter from public sector to mutuality
8. Last but not least, dramatically curtail the powers of corrupt lower House lawmakers to make war, send troops to warzones without thorough debate, or offer immunity come what may to Big Pharma and other suppliers. From here on, everyone high or low must be accountable and answerable to the Rule of Law.
Immediate short term focus:
*Health of the Monarch and the future Queen Mother: Full details of their 'turbo' cancer and its potential link to mRNA "vaccine" plus all available evidence to support a prosecution against Pfizer et al on a charge of Regicide.
*Presence or otherwise of EUNATO [specifically British] troops on the ground in the spreading Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Organisation of anti-War citizens of EU and UK/USA opposed to support for either side in terms of both weaponry and field troops/armour etc.
Failure to accede to these Civil demands to be met with mass resistance to further payments in any shape or form to HM Treasury, IRS, Brussels etc
This marks an appropriate note on which to end. Because of non-stop attempts to muzzle The Slog by social media in all the sizes and all the colours, ISP platform censorship, email products reneging fradulently on contractual obligations to deliver non-spam newsletters etc etc ad nauseam, The Slog will henceforth be sending ALL news notifications via its partnership with mailchimp.com….a mass mailout operation, fully automated and offering an open and efficient service guaranteeing delivery to followers.
So to be absolutely sure of seeing EVERY Slogpost I issue at The Slog site or via my independent Slogstack, I have no alternative other than to ask you to subscribe free by sending your email address to my gmail account, jawslog@gmail.com, and my now resident techie Kebba will ensure that such a request results in your addition to the 4,720 mailchimp followers list. Thereafter, should you decide I have finally lost my marbles, you require but one click on the word 'unsubscribe' to be freed from my alleged paranoia.
Best wishes and good luck to you all -
John Ward aka Anthony Ward aka Joe Blob but, as always, The Slog
/
No comments:
Post a Comment