A bill enabling Florida police, firefighters and paramedics to establish a harassment-free zone around themselves in the field is heading to the House after clearing the Legislature's upper chamber with unanimous support.
Senators voted 39-0 for the measure (SB 184), which would make it illegal for a person to approach or remain within 14 feet of a first responder performing their official duty after receiving a warning to back away.
The bill specifies that the restriction applies only to people who intend to threaten, harass or interfere with a first responder's work. Several Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about that standard.
Violators would face a first-degree misdemeanor charge, punishable by up to a year in prison and $1,000 in fines.
Miami Springs Republican Sen. Bryan Ávila, the bill's sponsor, argued that first responders need more protections while in the line of duty, particularly during large-scale events that hit South Florida during Spring Break and other big attractions.
"You've got to think about the situation that a lot of these first responders have to respond to. Usually in some of these cases, you don't know ... what people in the audience could potentially have on them. You don't know what was the reason or the rationale for the brawl or conflict, and you certainly don't know how many victims you have until you arrive on the scene," he said Wednesday during a Senate floor discussion of the bill, which passed Thursday morning.
"You're coming into a situation that is very tense, very up-tempo, and … if you don't stabilize it, it could really boil over into something bigger."
The scenario Ávila described is similar to examples Hialeah Republican Rep. Alex Rizo, who is sponsoring a similar House version of the legislation (HB 75), has used to advocate for the change since he first filed a bill in March 2021 to give emergency workers more enforceable space in public to do their jobs.
Rizo's bill then, its 2022 sequel and their Senate companions contemplated a 30-foot perimeter. Amid nationwide police reform protests and incidents of brutality in Miami Beach, which passed a similar restriction over which a tourist has since sued, none of the bills received a single hearing.
In Miami-Dade, a majority of the County Commission criticized the proposal as likely to worsen already tense police relations. Commissioner Kionne McGhee, a former House Democratic Leader, suggested that the bill was meant to deter and reduce the quality of filmed police encounters.
"This is basically a bill to kill camera pixels," he said. "I also see this as creating an arrest factory."
Rizo reduced the distance to 20 feet in his 2023 bill, the same as in the Miami Beach ordinance. Ávila cut it further in his companion bill to 14 feet, which he explained is the average length of a car.
Those distances remain the same in each bill this year. Rizo will have to either amend his bill, which now awaits a vote on the House floor, or send Ávila's bill back to the Senate to be amended so it matches the House version.
The long-accepted reactionary gap for police — the distance officers must keep between themselves and a suspect to respond to a sudden threat — is 25 feet if the suspect's hands aren't visible and 6-9 feet if they are.
While they ultimately voted for Ávila's bill, some of his Democratic colleagues expressed reservations about its potential to impede the right of citizens to document police behavior.
Senate Democratic Leader Lauren Book asked Ávila to confirm that nothing in the measure would preclude onlookers from recording law enforcement personnel as long as they remained outside the 14-foot radius after being told to back up.
Ávila assured her that was the case, adding that it is "a constitutional right for anybody to do that."
West Palm Beach Sen. Bobby Powell presented a scenario where two or more officers are working a scene, with one making an arrest and another enforcing a perimeter. In such a case, he said, would the distance people must move away increase to "fortysomething feet" so that they're in compliance with the bill's strictures?
Ávila downplayed the likelihood of that occurring, but did not dispute the possibility.
Some Democrats advocated for the measure. Kissimmee Sen. Vic Torres, a retired New York City Transit cop and former Marine, said he knew firsthand how difficult it is for officers in "chaotic situations."
"There are so many moving parts in a location, and we need to give the first responders, officers and paramedics the space they need to do their work," he said. "Sometimes people mean well, but they interfere with the process, and we need to pass legislation to make sure (we) protect them from harm."
Hollywood Sen. Jason Pizzo, a former prosecutor, said people know not to move beyond police do-not-cross tape because it could risk contaminating a crime scene, but they may exhibit less restraint when police are first securing the area.
He noted how in the aftermath of the June 2021 condo collapse in Surfside, he witnessed police having to keep parents from rushing into the rubble to search for their children.
"Certainly it was not unreasonable, but painful, to ask people to stay back for their own safety," he said. "I know that we may reflexively think or jump to horrible situations (like) the murder of George Floyd … but the overwhelming majority of cases will involve situations where (first responders are trying to enforce) the preservation of evidence, the sanctity of privacy and the sensitive nature and content (at the ) site of a crime."
No comments:
Post a Comment