Sen. Blaise Ingoglia wants to end the debate in Florida over whether reparations should be paid to descendants of slaves — by banning it in the state constitution.
On Monday, he filed a resolution (SJR 582) that would place a question on the 2024 ballot asking voters to approve a constitutional amendment prohibiting any government in Florida from "paying reparations to certain individuals."
Those individuals, the measure says, include anyone with an ancestor who was "an enslaved individual who lived in the United States before Dec. 6, 1865."
Congress abolished slavery that day through the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Ingoglia's proposal would first have to clear both chambers of the Legislature with 60% support before being placed on the ballot.
Florida Politics contacted Ingoglia's office for comment but received none by press time. The Spring Hill Republican was quoted Monday saying, "voters deserve a voice on whether their tax dollars should be used (to) further the agendas of candidates or elected officials who engage in race baiting tactics for political gain."
But Ingoglia, a former Florida GOP Chair who goes by the X handle @GovGoneWild, is no stranger himself to resorting to race-baiting to score political points. In February, he filed a bill (SB 1248) titled the "Ultimate Cancel Act" that would have eliminated the Democratic Party for once including slavery as part of its platform.
"For years now, leftist activists have been trying to 'cancel' people and companies for things they have said or done in the past. This includes the removal of statues and memorials, and the renaming of buildings," he said at the time. "Using this standard, it would be hypocritical not to cancel the Democratic Party itself for the same reason."
The bill died without a hearing.
Another measure by Fort Myers Republican Sen. Jonathan Martin that would have created protections for monuments of war, including those of confederate soldiers, fared slightly better but also died before reaching a floor vote. Ingoglia did not have a chance to weigh in on that bill, but he'll get another chance to; it's been refiled for the upcoming Session.
Miami Gardens Democratic Sen. Shevrin Jones, who has butted heads with Ingoglia on other controversial measures the Republican brought forth concerning immigration and election issues, called the anti-reparations proposal a "scare tactic" designed to distract voters from GOP mismanagement of the state.
"How can we take a bill seriously from someone who literally tried to 'cancel' the Democratic Party legislatively last year? It is perennially disappointing that Sen. Ingoglia and his allies in Tallahassee choose to manufacture crises over taking action on the pressing issues facing Floridians today," he told Florida Politics. "From the property insurance crisis to housing affordability to education disparities to gun violence, families across the state are kept up at night, worried and wondering why no one is tackling these challenges. Florida deserves better."
Arguments for and against reparations for slavery have carried on in the U.S. for more than two centuries. In recent years, support has grown among progressives who point to issues like gentrification, racial disparities in health outcomes and incarceration rates, and discrimination within financial and educational institutions as proof it remains a viable solution.
A 2019 study by Yale social psychologist Michael Kraus, for instance, found a sizable racial wealth gap persists today that significantly exceeds public perception. While most people believe that Black families have about $90 for every $100 a White family has today, the actual median household wealth of Black families is roughly half that sum.
Two-thirds of Americans are against cash payments to people whose ancestors were slaves, including most Whites, Asians and Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center. Black Americans overwhelmingly are for the move, and there is more support among younger people than their older counterparts.
Critics, particularly Republicans and conservatives, challenge the validity of reparations today. They point to a lack of specificity for what per-person payment would be appropriate, the criteria for calculating damages owed, how the money would be distributed, who or what entities should pay, and who would qualify as recipients.
Beyond that quandary, many also take issue with imposing on people several generations removed from slavery financial punishments for it.
Dozens of cities across the country and the state of California have been working to provide reparations to Black residents.
It wouldn't be cheap. In California, for instance, a task force made recommendations to pay out more than $1.2 million per person. The total cost to the state, which never endorsed slavery but enabled racist redlining and housing discrimination practices, among other things, could rise to $800 billion — 22% of the state's annual GDP.
Of note, Florida was the first state in the country to pay reparations to survivors of racial violence. In 1994, then-Democratic Gov. Lawton Chiles signed a measure approving a $2.1 million payment to known survivors and descendants of the 1923 massacre in Rosewood, where a White mob murdered residents and destroyed a Black town in Levy County.
The measure allotted $150,000 to each of the nine known survivors, $500,000 to be split between their descendants and $4,000 in college scholarships for their youngest family members.
Some of the Rosewood recipients have cited the measure — which did not include the term "reparations" — as a potential model for further amends for descendants of enslaved people.
It's been replicated since, though not for the purpose of slavery recompense. In June 2021, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill by former Democratic Sen. Randolph Bracy creating a scholarship for descendants of the 1920 massacre in Ocoee, a Central Florida city where a White mob murdered between 30 and 60 Black residents on Election Day.
As was the case with the Rosewood bill, Bracy's measure included no mention of the word, "reparations."
Bracy said the payments his bill cleared are indeed reparations and that he omitted the word only to appease his GOP colleagues who would have otherwise opposed it.
That technicality, however, may not withstand the new strictures Ingoglia proposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment