Is that NOT, a rule of thumb? If your directing instructor started getting improper with you, doesn't what you'd completed already, originally, count, despite if you'd, dropped the instructor as your mentor or not? And the N.T.U. needed a "mandate" for this??? and that just, BUSTS Tsai's LIE of how "our laws for the rights of the victims of sex crimes are among the most advanced in today's world", off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The N.T.U. instructional meetings recently made amendments to the rules of interactions of the professors mentoring the students, and stated clearly, that if professors are improper in sexual harassment or any other ways, the graduate student can terminate the mentorship, and the department needed to decide which the results of the work goes to in a month, this was a first civilized rule on such matter in all the universities in Taiwan.
Started in May of this year, the #MeToo started trending, there'd been an influx of cases sexual harassment of instructors toward the students coming out into the poen, the grad student from N.T.U. accused her mentoring professor for rubbing her breasts, patting her buttocks, and bear hugging her, and although the professor had been evaluated and found valid of sexual harassment, the professor had demanded the victim student to get a written agreement from him personally, to get her thesis approved so she could graduate, in the end, the student selected to rewrite her thesis.
And the meeting on October 20th at N.T.U., the rules got changed, added in a sixth regulation, stating that if the mentoring professor had sexually assaulted, molested, or bullied the student being mentored sexually, if the evaluation committee found the students' accusations to be valid, the grad student can have the gender equality committee to send a private notice to the professor, to terminate the mentoring relationship for the student.
The sixth also stated, that the day the college received the papers from the gender equality commissions, the mentorship is terminated, and the department shall immediately mediate for both professor and student to sign the "original research plans results evaluation belonging to either the professor or the student", and in one month, to get the results of this mediation, to send out a written notice to the graduate student, and the mentoring professor, and the college.
And so, this, is to protect the survivors (they're NOT victims!) of these power rapes from being abused again, and this is a step in the right directions, but, how come, this didn't come up earlier? Because from before, that was when the #MeToo hadn't started, trending, yet.
