Is King Charles a victim of Turbo-Cancer?
Although I am now hopelessly old, the one remaining source I have on an outer ring of the Planet Windsor confirmed to me yesterday morning that both Charles III and and his daughter-in-law Kate really did have ''vaccine'' jabs plus boosters in the Spring and Winter of 2021. Three years on, the former has cancer, and the latter has undergone mysterious [but ''serious''] abdominal surgery. But the obvious potential connection (in the light of Unexplained Death Syndrome among the jabbed and boosted) appears to be of no interest whatsoever to the MSM and online search engines in the West. Rather, they've preferred to cover in detail the latest examples of leftist insanity and irrelevance.
While concerned about the health of our Monarch C3PO, if he succumbs, the Labour Party was last week able to reassure the the King that once dead, he will be free to change his gender should he so desire. We await policy guidance from the Labour Executive in general and their highly execrated leader Queer Starkers as to how Charles might be asked whether he would prefer to have Charlene I or Boadicea II on the burial plaque in St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle once he is, as it were, a stiff.
Also last week, the same dominant political trend of Looney Tune Leftism on Speed formed a Collective, 'LGBTQ against Islamophobia'. This has to be by far the most cognitively dissonant insanity of the 21st century so far. In Saudi Arabia, for example, such a Group would be absolutely AOK if they stuck to yelling catchy slogans like ''Behead democrats!'', but very quickly thereafter they would become victims of the National Sport of Stoning depraved infidels to Death....and then chucked out of the upper floors of a minaret just to be absolutely sure that life was absent from the bag of stoned bones.
Thus are the questions that occur to ordinary citizens sacrificed on the altar of tiny minorities and their bonkers assertions which – in a majority decision liberal democracy – of course, must be tolerated...but not put at the centre of cultural civics and values as the basis of a sound and stable State.
The lunatics now dragging us towards potential Earthly nuclear immolation amount to a percentage of around 0.03% of the entire global human race. The genuine percentage of the population who are actively and licentiously practising homosexuals represent at most 3.4%. Active bisexuals are one in ten thousand at most. [This is why AIDS didn't become the widely-expected scourge of Mankind: in the UK, the dishonest estimates of pernicious lobby group Stonewall were accepted in toto by a Department of Health too lazy to study the data. I should know – the ad agency I headed at the time was centrally involved in it. It was one of my first experiences of being ordered to shut up and take the money. It was not my finest hour: I didn't stay long].
In order to inflate their claim to be authoritative, minority movements award themselves grandiose prefixes like 'World', 'Multinational' or 'Global', while referring to their regular events as forums, foundations and summits. The two things they all have in common – and that includes the 'United' Nations and the European 'Union' – is that first, they're never united; and second, they have rarely if ever faced an electorate in their lives.
But time and again, they are held up to the light as – in some odd way – opinion leaders with something original and relevant to say. Like self-styled ''liberal'' ideologues in general, they talk about being progressive...that is, those who represent moving forward [regardless of ethical or social compass] as ''building back better''. The US Democrats and UK Labour party increasingly refer to themselves as movements, in the Edwardian era we had the Suffragette movement, and in mid to late 1960s in the US, the Civil Rights movement.
Movements are just dandy so long they have the merit of going in an inclusive direction towards a Shangri La of freedom to think for oneself. Sadly, over time they have a tendency to turn into inflexible ideologies with overtones of religious orthodoxy: they move the line in the sand further and further ''forwards'' until any dissenting view is treated as.....yes, you know what's coming, reactionary.
And oh what woe must fall upon the reactionary. In 2024, the self-styled progressive movement still dominates – [''You can't say that sort of thing any more!''] but their presence in yet another elite guarantees that they are, again, a tiny minority. Many people feel unable to discern any more between what is really important, what is genuinely relevant to civilised behaviour, or what has strayed into the cuckoo's nest of insane nonsense.
As the opening examples with which I began demonstrated [albeit using questionable taste], the elite Movements we tolerate in 2024 are – to be technically descriptive here for a second – full of shit. Their ''movements'' are Bowel Movements: malodorous waste material to be flushed away to the sewers as soon as possible.
As the old Brooklyn adage has it, ''Eat shit folks...twenty zillion flies can't be wrong''.
I italicise and embolden/highlight the next two lines because they are at the centre of my philosophy about social anthropology:
There's a vast difference between being a 'progressive', and making better progress towards an accountable balance between Citizen Freedom and State regulation.
This is not in any way linguistic pedantry or literary onanism – quite the opposite: I am examining here the degree to which the use of progressive as a term is no less than antithetical to the desire of every Freeman never again to be a slave.
Hillary Clinton beat her Wimmin's Drum harder than most before, during and after her husband's Presidency...and then blamed the ''glass ceiling'' against a female Presidency that ''robbed'' her of victory in 2016. In fact she was crushed 304-227 by the popular appeal of MAGA, because Donald Trump sensed more than anyone how fed up Americans were with biting tongues and using ''correct'' euphemisms.
Clinton learned nothing from the experience. In fact she is on the record as sounding like a Sovyet Kommissar of the early 1950s when, as recently as October 2023, she told CNN:
''The entire MAGA cult is probably going to need formal deprogramming of the members...sadly, so many of those extremists, those MAGA extremists, take their marching orders from Donald Trump, who has no credibility left by any measure...He's only in it for himself....At some point, there needs to be a backlash against the control that this small group of extremists have''.
Oh dear. Aleksander Solzhenytsin, eat your Gulag heart out.
Now we have an eminent US conservative journalist and broadcaster in Tucker Carlson who is alleged to be about to interview the Washington Post's favourite cancer-riddled demon from Hell, Vladimir Putin. The Wapo [widely recognised in DC as the CIA's inhouse magazine] covered the development with 100% proof brainless propaganda as follows:
''The blustering American TV personality Tucker Carlson has lambasted the United States for sending too much aid to Ukraine, called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "sweaty and rat-like," and given credence to Russia's baseless justifications for its invasion....The former Fox News host's rhetoric on the war — he has called it a U.S.-led "regime-change war" against Russia — and his attacks on Zelensky's government — "a pure client state of the United States State Department" — aligns so well with the major propaganda points of Russian state television that one channel has decided to broadcast Carlson's new show on X, formerly Twitter''
The piece [by that well-known hyper-anti Putin stooge you never heard of, Mary Ilyushina] simply doesn't qualify as journalism....and would've been very much at home in Pravda's heyday under Stalin.
CNN is this morning is predictably vicious....before reading/watching any of the interview:
'In a video posted to X announcing the sit-down Tuesday — the first interview Putin has granted with a Western media figure since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine two years ago — Carlson predictably and dishonestly villainized the press. The right-wing extremist, who has lauded autocrats in recent years, claimed English-speaking outlets are "corrupt" and "lie" to their audiences as they disseminate "propaganda of the ugliest kind.'
Oliver Darcy is the author of that little gem. He talks of Carlson villainizing the media, and then proceeds to deliver a biased hatchet job.....like one of the feral infants from Lord of the Flies.
But this is the MSM today: ignore the evidence, do exactly as you're told, don't lose any sleep about persuading millions of people into an early death, don't ask any awkward questions, smear and demonise and slag off everyone who's awake as conspiranoid, dismiss Sunak as nothing more than stupid, ignore the fact that our Foreign Secretary was a proven grubby, online scammer, and our Chancellor falsified employee questionnaires to win an Evening Standard award. Predictably, the lowest point of all the low-life was Piers Morgan, who goaded people by calling them ''wimps who are too scaredycat to have the jab''. Never did any Fourth Estate flabby hack deserve his anagram - Romping Arse - more than our Piers.
Yes indeed Smears Morgan the pirate, it is indeed you of whom we write...just when the world needs a huge dollop of investigative journalism to break the grip of the EUNATO/Davos elite monster, a washed-up gossipy phone-hacker and allround spineless jellyfish slithers onto a beach from the dark ocean of totalitarian lies and unfortunately, the only thing he's investigating [twas ever thus] is his own back passage.
Anyway people, it's 11.20 am ECOWAS time here in Africa, the world still waits with baited breath to read the content of Tucker Carlson's Putin interview, but it's time this post was put to bed - the sooner to be 90 per cent censored by the dastardly depopulators and their close allies....the entire Fourth Estate, members of 32 allegedly elected Assemblies, police, military deadbeats and electorates too alienated, badly educated and lazy to give a fuck.
In departing for the time being, however, I offer you this sample of radical reality, so help me God: I suspect I'd no more want to have lunch with Trump and Putin than I would with Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron, Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen, Vlodomore Zelensky or Guy Verhofstadt. Nevertheless, with Trump and Putin I doubt if I'd have to count my fingers after the encounter. That doesn't make me what Lenin called ''a useful idiot''. It merely represents the desire of a bloke with three small grandchildren not to have them irradiated and then enslaved in order to satisfy the greed, megalomania and systemics of wannabe Demigods.
I make no apology for the naked anger in this post. What you do is your business: you are, after all, a free human being...even if you place so little value on that privilege.
No comments:
Post a Comment