Based off of a video of Pottinger, the conclusion drawn by someone from the U.S., in W-H-O would be, responsible for the coming of, WW III, and this is totally, unfounded if you ask me, but hey, who asked you??? Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
On July 2nd, Jose Vega from the U.S. posted a footage of himself, angrily blaming the assistant to National Security, Pottinger. He'd stated, that Pottinger in his speech, had blasphemed against China for inciting World War III, which caused his friends and him who are in the audience to feel, upset, and so, they'd, stood up and rebutted Pottinger. Comparing to this, the Dean of Hong Kong Chinese Language University's Public Policies Department, Cheng stated, that if China picks sides in the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict, no matter which side China chooses to be on, "this may be the start of World War III."
The former showed the classic mindset of the U.S.—the Chinese government, is "no doubt, inciting a World War"; while the latter, propagandize the Chinese tactical philosophy of –doing everything to avoid a country from involvement into a major conflict in the world", to continue to enjoy world peace.
Needless to say, a lot of people are now, worrying that we are, not far off from World War III. But, where does this, worry come, from?
The conflict that Vega described was from the July first "Asian Association" seminar in New York, with the topic of "Possibility of War Between Taiwan & China", in the footage, there's NOT the exact words of the deputy national security consultant during Trump's presidency. But, claims similar to his had been coming out, multiple times, and on the day his new book, "The Boiling Moat" went on the shelves on the day, and the book told of the possibilities, of the realities of Chinese government starting a war.
The following, Pottinger continued to lecture at the Traditional Foundation, and focused on one point, "there are no accidental wars in the world". He said, if a war started in what seemingly as an, accidental event, it did not begin because of a misunderstanding. He'd stated, that it was from Xi's conscious, decision, because China had already, spent decades in training, arming the military, while, starting up this war is beneficial to China. He'd even deducted, that the provocation of China in the Philippines, is a "drill" for invading into, Taiwan.
And, oddly enough, on the same day that Bottinger got called out, the secretary of N.A.T.O. was interviewed by a Japanese press, he'd openly accused China for "inciting the biggest war since World War II on the European front".
and here are, the TOP TEN, "candidates", in competition to start WW III, off of the WWW
And yet, a few days before Bottinger's speech, the anniversary celebration of "Getting Along Peacefully based off of Five Principles Seventieth Anniversary" was hosted in Beijing. Cheng mentioned on the forum, that he'd told his American friends of the Russo-Ukrainian Conflicts, that if China chooses sides, the world would've gone to hell. But because China did NOT choose sides, instead, China is on the side of peace developments, the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict did NOT spread deeper into other parts of the world.
And so, from this, it seemed to be pointing, at how China is with the powers to start World War III or keep it from happening, but, does it, have the POWERS? Of course N-O-T, if WORLD WAR three is going to happen, then, the cause would be delegated to ALL the countries big and small in the world, and there's no "in name of justice" or even "human rights" we fight, it's all every country for itself. And so, it's not ONE solitary "world power" that's inciting the coming of World War III, it's EVERY country in the world that's, pushing the global community toward, WWIII right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment