Thursday, August 15, 2024

The Tainan District Attorney’s Office: it’d Been a DECADE Since the Case of Chen, the Former Spokesperson of the Executive Department Was Suspected of Being Given Sexual Favors, and All the Women Who were Involved, Including Yun, “Vanished”

The Tainan District Attorney's Office: it'd Been a DECADE Since the Case of Chen, the Former Spokesperson of the Executive Department Was Suspected of Being Given Sexual Favors, and All the Women Who were Involved, Including Yun, "Vanished"

By taurusingemini on August 16, 2024

And this case of sexual favors from the bars to the former spokesperson for the Executive Department only comes out, and it'd been, TEN FUCKING (so???) years since the case had occurred, see how the DDP, DELAYED in working this case of, bribery, because this is a member of their own…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The investigations of Chen, the former speaker of Executive Department came out, the online community got into heated discussion of "where did Yun go?", as the investigation went on, the Tainan D.A.'s Office found that the operators of the bar, not only assigned "Yun" and, "Ai-Ling", "Ai-Jia", and other call girls, the D.A. pointed out, because "Yun" and others were the false names that the female servers used, it'd been more than a decade since the sex scandals, and, all the involved parties are, all without any leads, there's no confirmation of the identity of "Yun" and the other women.

here's the SEX ADDICTED politician, weaseling his way out of what he did to the press, video from YouTube...

The investigation by the D.A.'s office showed, that in the screen shot of the conversation on Line of Chen and the Wang the operators of the bar, Wang mentioned, "I would need some assistance from you", and there was one time that Wang mentioned "the changes of construction means of the show room", Chen responded and asked, "will Yun be available?"

While the name, "Yun" had appeared three times in books kept by the bar which had been confiscated by the D.A.'s Office as evidence, which suggested that "Yun" had worked in the bar during the time, and, as Chen was told that it wouldn't be convenient for her, Chen inquired, "is there someone else like her?", and the response, "yes, same place?", which was evidentiary, of Chen's being in contact with "Yun", and knew what she looked like, that was why he'd inquired, "is there someone else like her?", and the meeting place is clearly noted, when the destinated location had been posted, the ladies would show up to the locations.

In the translation from the surveillance the D.A. had of Chen, the law enforcement found, that in November of 2013, the employees called Wang up, Wang asked, "is 'Ai-Jia' working today?", the D.A. believed, that Chen had specifications for the hookers, and was satisfied of the "services" that "Ai-Jia" provided him, he'd especially asked Wang for her name, and on December 15^th of the same year, he'd used Line and asked Wang, if he could sent over the female waitress, "Yun", as the woman offered similar "services" too.

So, this is a HUGE, sex scandal, and it took the law enforcement a whole FUCKING ten years, for the facts of the case to start, exposing themselves, and this is how SLOW these important cases are being worked, and this still just showed, how corrupt the government officials are under the DDP rule.